<span>input, output, and feedback</span>
People must be told what they are being charged with
The answer is: Civil Rights Act of 1964
Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act was created to prohibit discrimination toward people who have disabilities in terms of receiving federal assistance or treatment in the work place.
Section 504 of the 1973 rehabilitation act was inspired by Civil Rights Act of 1964. But, Civil right Act of 1964 only protect discrimination based on race, religion, skin color, sex or national origin. Civil right act of 1964 did not mentioned disabled people. So, Section 504 of the 1973 rehabilitation act borrowed the language directly and applied it to the disabled.
<span>while they create the illusion of listening they mostly do what they think is required to be re-elected.
Note the current republicans who are silent on tweets etc. Teh don't want to get involved so their action/speech can be used against them in future elections</span>
It's the practical-ish solution for individuals seeking monetary remedies too low in proportion to attorney fees, and requiring more legally binding enforcement measures than those provided by mediation/arbitration. The ish suffix indicates that it's not the democratized "people's court" that everyone thinks it is... We've found that it's not very useful for low-income, immigrant or shy folks which either don't feel confident enough, or are so ensnared by the legal system that they never think small claims court a viable solution for their problems.
<span>It also plays a great entertainment role, apparently, given the popularity of daytime shows such as that of the assertive Mrs. Judge Judy.</span>