Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation:
The reason why it's not A. : A delusion and a snare. Sound and fury signifying nohting. "A delusion and a snare" is a fragment because it does not have on complete thought. A delusion and a snare, what? It is often helpful to ask what they are supposed to be doing. "Sound and fury signifying nohting" is lacking what sound and furry, where are they coming from? B. The first "sentence" is incomplete as discussed in A. The second "setence" is improperly using the word they, you cannot say "they was". C. With sound and fury signifying nothing, the battle was both a delusion and a snare. This sentence states a clear thought. It is the only sentence from this list that actually would make sense saying aloud.
Hopefully this will help you :)
Answer:
B. The writer views Musa's great wealth as the most important part of the article
Explanation:
Hope this helps :))
The theme being presented was think twice before you say anything. I think this was the theme because, the grasshopper could not be responsible of getting food, and the ants did not want to give their food. So the theme was think twice before you say anything.
The inference is that the details from the excerpt that best support the conclusion that children are the author's intended audience include:
the terms "kun" and "payah kun"
the use of animals to tell a magical story
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
It should be noted that the context clues are important to understand the story that's illustrated.
In this case, the inference is that the details from the excerpt that best support the conclusion that children are the author's intended audience include the terms "kun" and "payah kun" and the use of animals to tell a magical story.
These shows that the audience were children.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
