1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
masha68 [24]
3 years ago
12

My famous quote was disputed by aristotle, although time proved me correct answer

History
1 answer:
ipn [44]3 years ago
7 0
Democritus is your answer.
You might be interested in
How would higher tariffs on British goods protect American businesses?
Butoxors [25]

<em><u>Answer:</u></em>

<em><u /></em>

<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>

<em><u>This protective tariff helped American industry by raising the prices of British manufactured goods, which were often cheaper and of higher quality than those produced in the U.S. This raised prices for Southern consumers and caused John Calhoun to oppose the tariff.</u></em>

3 0
3 years ago
How did nationalist feelings endanger the Austro Hungarian empire? Who has this quick check???
tester [92]
<span>The Austro-Hungarian empire was endangered by feelings of nationalism because there were multiple national groups within the empire. So fulfilling nationalist goals would mean a dividing of the empire. The mere fact that the question refers to the empire as "Austro-Hungarian" is already a strong hint of the issue. Prior to 1867, it had been known as simply the Austrian Empire, but a compromise in 1867 meant that a dual monarchy was recognized (an Austrian ruler and a Hungarian ruler). The Hungarians were given self-governing authority over their own internal affairs in their portion of the empire. Other people groups within the empire would seek their own recognition as well -- Czechs, Serbs, Croats, etc. So where nationalism was a uniting factor in regions like the Italian peninsula and the German territories north of Austria, for the Austrian empire, nationalism was a dividing force.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Do you think the framers of the Constitution could have limited or banned slavery? Why or why not?
malfutka [58]

Answer: Here you go

Explanation:

The founders of the constitution were not able to ban or limit slavery at the time. The reason being that the South was not accepting of the constitution without them being able to own slaves and because of that slaves were allowed to be own till the civil war. The reason behind the South not accepting the constitution was because slaves were the driving reason the south was thriving, without slaves the souths economy would have tanked since farming was their main industry, unlike the north which was an overall industrial powerhouse.  

4 0
3 years ago
What was an essential key factor in the development of civilization during this period?
vivado [14]
What period are you talking about?
3 0
3 years ago
Which was a consequence of Augusto pinochet's rule in chile in the 1970s
tatuchka [14]
People had very little political freedom
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did england go to war to keep the american colonies?
    5·2 answers
  • The west of 1800
    13·1 answer
  • What vision does santiago have when he witnesses the hawks in the desert?
    7·1 answer
  • In 1853, what purchase completed Manifest Destiny by adding the last strip of land that completed the continental United States
    13·1 answer
  • Scenario 1
    6·2 answers
  • How did immigrants try to assimilate into American society?
    8·1 answer
  • Is this right, please help
    7·1 answer
  • What is Great Britain mother country named
    13·1 answer
  • What is the work known as The Thousand and One Nights?
    6·2 answers
  • Question 1 of 17
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!