Answer:
The question has below options:
A. The unsold cars count as inventory investment for 2017. 2018 GDP is not affected.
B.The unsold cars count as consumption spending in 2018.
C. The unsold cars count in the inventory investment category for both years and count as consumption spending in 2018.
Option B is the correct answer
Explanation:
The unsold stock of 10 cars in 2017 is classified as investment since the cost of producing them is expected to yield returns in 2018 when they have been sold.
However, the unsold stock of 2017 becomes 2018 consumption of GDP since it relates to household expenditure in 2018, as a result it is accorded such classification.
It cannot be classified as government expenditure as the government is not the one purchasing the vehicle
Also, the ten cars have nothing to do with import or export as they are trade within the domestic economy
Answer:
Operating income will be $6,000
Explanation:
The computation of the operating income is shown below:
= Total cost - outsourcing cost
where,
Total cost = Variable cost + fixed cost
Variable cost = Number of microwaves × variable cost per unit
= 500 × $26
= $13,000
And, the fixed cost is $7,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $13,000 + $7,000
= $20,000
And, the outsourcing cost equal to
= Number of microwaves × outsourcing cost per unit
= 500 × $28
= $14,000
So, the net income would be
= $20,000 - $14,000
= $6,000
Answer:
The Kmart was held by the court not liable because David assumed the risks of sledding.
Explanation:
Negligent actions are those actions that come under the rubric of tort actions. To prove negligent actions against a person or a company, the plaintiff is required to prove four things in court– duty, breach, causation, and damages.
In the given case, the court will not be held Kmart liable because David (the consumer) was aware of the risks involved in the sledding. Therefore, the case of negligent actions is not applicable for Kmart.
The statement "The Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002 was created to protect consumers against false advertising by monopolies." is false.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act placed the obligation of responsibility for a company's financial reporting squarely on the shoulders of its top executives in order to safeguard investors from corporate accounting fraud.
It required chief executive officers (CEOs) and chief financial officers (CFOs) to personally attest to the correctness of the information in financial reports and to affirm that controls and procedures were in place to evaluate and verify that accuracy.
In reality, CEOs and CFOs had to personally certify that financial reports complied with Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC) rules by signing them. Failure to comply with this might result in fines of up to $15 million and 20-year prison terms.
Hence, the given statement is false.
Learn more about the Securities and Exchange Commission:
brainly.com/question/3798508
#SPJ1
Answer:
The price per share should be $22.5
Explanation:
The price earnings multiple or P/E tells us how much price the investors are willing to pay for $1 earnings of the company.
We first need to calculate the earnings per share of the company.
Earnings per share = Net Income / Number of outstanding common shares
Earnings per share = 1500000 / 1000000 = $1.5 per share
Using the P/E for the industry, the price per share of Flintstone should be,
P/E = Price per share / Earnings per share
15 = Price per share / 1.5
15 * 1.5 = Price per share
Price per Share = $22.5
