Teenagers question society’s rules and they get involved in idealistic cause because argues that when children make the transition to formal operational through at about age 12, they can see underneath the surface of adult guidelines. He believes when children first become in agreement to other people’s faults, this feeling goes innermost to become an fascination with what others consider about their own personal faults. Imaginary audience is the tenure for the affinity of young teenagers to feel that every person is viewing their action; a constituent of adolescent egocentrism. Personal fable is the tenure for the affinity of young teenagers to believe that their existence is distinctive and heroic; a constituent of adolescent egocentrism.
The answer is Moral Panic
Also called 'Public Fear', it is described as a collective Public anxiety or a feeling of threat towards a particular situation which they believe can completely destroy the society they live in.
In history, there has been several cases of Moral Panic starting from early times when e.g. the Japanese saw foreigners as a threat or when so-called witches were burned in Europe.
Recent moral panic examples include the threat of Communism, HIV as a 'gay' disease and the threat of Global warming.
In history, many governments have created 'Moral Panic' as a propaganda tool in wars and to deviate public perception.
Early Roman alphabet is the answer.
Explanation:
horses came in 1519. ndndjdj
The correct answer is the actor-observer bias.
The actor-observer bias (AOB) refers to the phenomenon where we attribute our own behavior to external factors beyond our personal control, while attributing others' behavior to factors internal to them, and fully within their control. In this instance, Tom believes that he is unable to stop gambling due to the negative influence of his friends (an external factor beyond his control), while believing that Barnaby is unable to stop gambling because he is addicted to it (a factor internal to Barnaby). Thus, Tom is demonstrating the actor-observer bias