Answer:
$7.5
Greater
Explanation:
Price elasticity of demand = percentage change in quantity demanded/ percentage change in price
0.2 = 10%/ percentage change in price
percentage change in quantity demanded = 50% = 0.5
0.5 = (New price - $5) / $5
New price = (5 × 0.5) + 5 = $7.5
In the short run, demand is relatively inelastic because consumers need time to find suitable substitutes but in the long run, demand is usually more elastic.
I hope my answer helps you
<span>The correct answer is 60%.
Over 60% of patent holders are successful when bringing infringement suits. This high rate of success ensures that patent holders receive just compensation for their work and that others cannot wrongfully benefit from their ideas. A successful patent infringement suit can require the defendant to pay monetary damages to the patent holder in addition from stopping their wrongful use of the patent.</span>
Answer:
Ending inventory : $868
Explanation:
FIFO (First-In-First-Out) is a method of inventory valuation where the inventory that is received first is sold first. In other words, the earliest inventory is used first. This is common for perishable inventory such as fruits and vegetables which if not used fast, will be wasted.
01/01/21 : Beginning Inventory : 200 units x $5 = $1000
01/15/21 : Purchases : 100 units x $5.3 = $530
01/28/21 : Purchases : 100 units x $5.5 = $550
Total units = 200 + 100 + 100 = 400 units
Units sold = Total inventory available for sale - ending inventory
= 400 - 160 = 240 units.
COGS:
Beginning Inventory : 200 units x $5 = $1000
Purchases : 40 units x $5.3 = $212
Cost of goods sold : $1000 + $212 = $1212
Ending inventory:
Purchases : (100 - 40) units x $5.3 = $318
Purchases : 100 units x $5.5 = $550
Ending inventory : $318 + $550 = $868
Answer:
Explanation:
United States is producing 200 tons of hamburgers and 60 tons of tacos.
United States' opportunity cost for producing 1 ton of hamburgers
= 
= 0.3
United States' opportunity cost for producing 60 tons of tacos.
= 
= 3.33
So we see that US has a lower opportunity cost in producing hamburgers, so it has a comparative advantage in producing hamburgers.
Mexico is producing 40 tons of hamburgers and 50 tons of tacos.
Mexico's opportunity cost of producing a ton of hamburgers
= 
= 1.25
Mexico's opportunity cost of producing a ton of tacos
= 
= 0.8
So we see that Mexico has a lower opportunity cost in producing tacos, so it has a comparative advantage in making tacos.
Since US specializes in making hamburgers, it will produce 200 tons of hamburgers and 0 tons of tacos.
Mexico specializes in making tacos, it will produce 50 tons of tacos and 0 tons of hamburgers.
Answer: When assessing the risks of investment, one should consider the political, economic, and legal risks of doing business in either Russia or Poland. The risk in Russia would probably be considered higher than the risk in Poland since Poland has been a member state of the European Union since 1 May 2004, with the Treaty of Accession 2003 signed on 16 April 2003 in Athens as the legal basis for Poland's accession to the EU.
Poland has already gained benefits and stability offered by the EU. Russia, by contrast, is still many years away from even being in a position to be considered by the EU for membership.
Explanation: A diligent investor wouldn't put a penny in a risky country.