Answer:
12 years
Step-by-step explanation:
Represent the mother's age by m and the son's by 4. Currently m = 36 years old.
In x years the mother will be three times as old as her son:
mother: 36 + x years old
son: 4 + x years old
The pertinent equation to solve is:
36 + x = 3(4 + x)
Performing the multiplication, we get:
36 + x = 12 + 3x, or
24 = 2x. Then x = 12.
Check: In 12 years, will the mother's age be 3 times the son's age?
Does 36 + 12 = 3(4 + 12)?
Does 48 = 48? YES
The mother will be 3 times as old as her son in 12 years from now.
Answer:
Okay I might not be right on this one but, I believe you divide 27 and 3. As to the part about simplifying, you might want to give me so details.
Step-by-step explanation:
The smallest prime number of p for which p^3 + 4p^2 + 4p has exactly 30 positive divisors is 43.
<h3>What is the smallest prime number of p for which p must have exactly 30 positive divisors?</h3>
The smallest number of p in the polynomial equation p^3 + 4p^2 + 4p for which p must have exactly 30 divisors can be determined by factoring the polynomial expression, then equating it to the value of 30.
i.e.
By factorization, we have:
Now, to get exactly 30 divisor.
- (p+2)² requires to give us 15 factors.
Therefore, we can have an equation p + 2 = p₁ × p₂²
where:
- p₁ and p₂ relate to different values of odd prime numbers.
So, for the least values of p + 2, Let us assume that:
p + 2 = 5 × 3²
p + 2 = 5 × 9
p + 2 = 45
p = 45 - 2
p = 43
Therefore, we can conclude that the smallest prime number p such that
p^3 + 4p^2 + 4p has exactly 30 positive divisors is 43.
Learn more about prime numbers here:
brainly.com/question/145452
#SPJ1
Answer: 230cm²
Step-by-step explanation:
>We can do this by splitting the figure into 2 trapeziums.
>Additionally, you can see that both trapeziums bear the same lengths a and b. Hence, we can use this formula: 
.
>Thus,
Area = 
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
81
=
3
4
and
27
=
3
3
, so this equation can also be written as
3
4
x
=
3
3
(
x
+
2
)
=
3
3
x
+
6
.
Since the bases are now the same, we can equate exponents to get
4
x
=
3
x
+
6
so that
x
=
6
(technically this equating of exponents requires the fact that exponential functions (with base not equal to 1) are one-to-one functions).
(do u understand?)
