The answer is ports with ships.
Erikson's main idea of what happens if you do not master the conflict of a given age (the equivalent of a Freudian fixation) is identity crisis. Each conflict has two parts: the successful outcome one wants, and the negative outcome which comes from failing to master the conflict. Tye conflict of adolescence is identity vs confusion. If one should fail to master this conflict, they will be confused as to who they are, will not feel like they fit in, and will waver between varying personality types in an effort to discover their identity.
Answer:
The correct answer is : C
a. appropriate, as the quick increase in the frequency of Allie's participation will likely significantly enhance the class's conversation.
b. appropriate, as twenty minutes is a brief time period so Allie won't struggle with the issue of delayed gratification.
c. inadvisable, as the expectation that Allie so quickly make so many comments may lead to anxiety and ultimately cause the plan to fail.
d. inadvisable, as by third grade, Allie should be able to demonstrate self-monitoring over a longer period of time.
Explanation:
In this case, Allie is making many comments so quickly and this situation can cause anxiety because of her shyness so the plan would not have the outcome expected and she may be in a very uncomfortable situation due to her personality. This action wouldn't be recommendable as a good strategy.
What we are looking for is the confidence interval.
Given:
Sample it is denoted by n = 10
Mean = 80
Standard deviation = 12
Confidence Interval = 99%
Now compute for the margin of error, the formula is Za/2 * σ/√(n)
A 99% level of confidence has a critical value of zα/2 = 2.58.
The standard error is σ/√(n) = 3.162
Multiply 2.58 by 3.162 = 9.8 is the margin of error.
The formula for confidence interval is x̅ ± Za/2 * σ/√(n)
= 80 ± 9.8
= 70.2 < x< 89.8
