Answer: Price ceilings are beneficial to society, and are often necessary, in that they make sure that essential goods are financially accessible to the average person, at least in the short run. By lowering costs, price ceilings also have the beneficial effect of helping to stimulate demand, which can contribute to the health of an economy.
However, there can also be downsides to price ceilings. While they stimulate demand, price ceilings can also cause shortages. Where the ceiling is set, there is more demand than at the equilibrium price. This means that the amount of the good or service supplied is less than the quantity demanded.
For example: in agriculture, medicine, and education, many governments set maximum prices to make the needed goods or services more affordable. Producers may respond to such an economic situation by rationing supplies, decreasing production levels or lowering the quality of production, making the consumer pay extra for otherwise free elements of the good (features, options, etc.), and more.
Request: Can I please get brainliest
Answer:
The computations are shown below:
Explanation:
a. The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:


= 229 units
The carrying cost is come from
= $2.40 × 20%
b. Time between placement of orders is
= Economic order quantity ÷Annual demand
= 229 ÷ 280
= 0.8179 years
So,
= 0.8179 × 365 days
= 298.53 days
We assume 365 days in a year
c. The average annual cost of ordering cost and carrying cost equals to
= Holding cost + ordering cost
= (Economic order quantity ÷ 2 × Holding cost) + (Annual demand ÷ Economic order quantity × ordering cost)
= (229 units ÷ 2 × $0.48) + (280 ÷ 229 units × $45)
= $54.96 + $55.02
= $109.98
d)
Now the reorder level is
= Demand × lead time + safety stock
where, Demand equal to
= Expected demand ÷ total number of weeks in a year
= 280 pounds ÷ 52 weeks
= 5.38461
So, the reorder point would be
= 5.38461 × 3 + $0
= 16.15 pounds
Answer:
$2681.30 approx.
Explanation:
The first annuity is case of annuity due
For the first annuity, $2500 + 2500 × cumulative present value factor at 7.25% for 14 years
= $2500 + 8.6158 × 2500
= $24040 approx
The second annuity is the case of deferred annuity wherein payments are made at the end of the year.
Payment amount of second annuity = Present Value of first annuity ÷ cumulative present value annuity factor at 7.25% for 15 years
This will be equal to 24,040/8.9658 = $2681.30 approx.
Common stockholders will not receive any money before the preferred stock holders in the case of the company having to liquidate. So thats a disadvantage. Preferred stockholders tend to get higher dividends paid out to them, which is an advantage.
I believe this problem has the following choices:
They talk about family problems as they arise.
Renaldo discusses his ex-wife's flaws in front of the
children.
Renaldo and Inez make time each week to spend alone
together.
The family regularly spends time with other stepfamilies.
The family has enrolled in a course to learn how to avoid
problems.
From the text, we can conclude that the correct answer
is:
>Renaldo discusses his ex-wife's flaws in front of the
children.