<span>The demand curve is based on the price of an item and the amount that people are willing to pay for it. Marketers want to see this, because it helps them figure out how to advertise to the public and what the public wants. This can be useful in pricing items so that they are lower than that of the competitors.</span>
Answer:
a) 15 to 35 approximately 95%
(b) 10 to 40 approximately almost all
(c) 20 to 30 approximately 68%
Explanation:
The data have a bell-shaped distribution which means the data is equally distributed on both sides of the mean.
We have the mean at 25 and a standard deviation of 5 which means that the interval is for each of the values of 5 .
The mean would be u and
The first value would be u ±σ = 25 ± 5= 20 and 30 (68 % )
The second value will be u ± 2σ= 25± 10 = 15 and 35 (95%)
The third value will be u ± 3σ= 25 ± 15 = 10 and 40 (99.7 % almost all)
In the figure below the light blue region gives u ±σ on both sides of the mean
, dark blue gives u ± 2σ values on both sides of the mean and grey gives
u ± 3 σ values on both sides of the mean.
It is obvious that 68 % of the data is contained in the u ±σ light blue region, 95 % of the data in the u ± 2σ dark blue including light blue and 99.7 % in the u ± 3σ all colored regions.
Answer:
(b.) Isabel will have a judgment entered in her favor
Explanation:
Under the Rules of the court Josh's action is referred to as Default of Appearance. Isabel is the Complainant while Josh is the Defendant.
It is the law that where a Defendant fails to appear before the court where there is a proof of service of the summons on him or her, Complainant may apply to the Judge for a judgement in respect of the claim on the summons to be entered in his or her favor against the Defendant.
Therefore, in the instance case at hand, Isabel will have a judgment entered in her favor for failure of Josh to appear before the court.
Option (a) is not the answer because Isabel does not need to file an amended complaint because Isabel did not ask the court for any amendment of her complaint. Isabel can only file an amended complaint if she intends to change her complaint against Josh.
Option (c) is not also the answer because Josh chooses to ignore the summons served on him. If for instance Josh did not get the summons served on him or the judge is of the opinion that Josh was not properly served, then the court can order that Josh must be served with a second summons.
Option (d) is also not the answer because Josh cannot have a judgment entered in his favor because he is the person who defaulted appearance before the court. A party who is in default of appearance cannot have judgment entered in his favor.
The broker should refuse to release the earnest money even after the seller requested the earnest money prior to the property inspection.
<h3>What is earnest money?</h3>
Earnest money refers to the deposit paid by a buyer to a seller, reflecting the good faith of a buyer in purchasing a home.
It is the money paid to a merchant or seller to complete a contract or money paid to a merchant / seller to show good faith in the transaction.
Hence, the broker should refuse to release the earnest money even after the seller requested the earnest money prior to the property inspection.
Learn more about earnest money here : brainly.com/question/14342438
Answer:
Option A; AN INVASION OF PRIVACY.
Explanation:
Invasion of privacy is the unjustifiable intrusion into the personal life of another without consent. It is used to describe a circumstance where an individual or organization knowingly intrudes upon a person.
An invasion of privacy is considered to be a tort.
The four most common types of invasion of privacy torts are:
Appropriation of Name or Likeness
Intrusion Upon Seclusion
False Light
Public Disclosure of Private Facts
The display of the checks of customers is a public disclosure of private fact of the customers, therefore, it is AN INVASION OF PRIVACY.
