Answer:
Tells us we need to download something, sorry mate.
Explanation:
Answer:
10.60%
Explanation:
First, we calcualte the returns and then solve for the rate like a normal compounding:
<u>returns:</u>
annual coupon payment. 1,000 face value x $ 13.68 = $ 136.80
sales price: 913.73
<u>total:</u> 136.8 x 6 + 913.73 = 820.80 + 913.73 =
<em />
<u>cost: </u> 947.68
to record the effective rate of return:
![\sqrt[6]{\frac{1,734.5}{947.68}} -1 = r_e](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B6%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%2C734.5%7D%7B947.68%7D%7D%20-1%20%3D%20r_e)
<u>effective rate of return:</u> 0.105992287 = 10.60%
Keynes would most likely oppose a plan for government control of all the manufacturing companies.
Answer:
$4
$1 and $3
False
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
a)
Amount of tax for each bottle is $4 because the sellers are receiving $2 and buyers are paying $6. Therefore,
Amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $6 - $2 = $4
b)
Burden on the consumer = $6 - $5
= $1
Burden on the seller = $4 - $1
= $3
c)
False, because the tax incidence depends on the flexibility or elasticity of market.
Answer:
b) false
Explanation:
In the case of theory that developed by MM in this the investor have no need for concering with respect to the dividend policy of the company as in this the sell option is there with regard to the equity portfolio when they need the cash
So according to the given situation, the given statement is false
hence the option b is correct
