Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
x(2y - 3) ← multiply each term in the parenthesis by x
= 2xy - 3x
Answer: #444
Step-by-step explanation:
First find the original selling price of the article.
When sold for #372 the profit was 24%. Assume the original price is x.
372 = x + 24% * x
372 = 1.24x
x = 372 / 1.24
= #300
If he wanted to make a profit of 48% he should have sold for:
= Original price + (original price * 48%)
= 300 + (300 * 48%)
= #444
Well first we need to do whatever is in the parentheses, which in this case is: (5x1/20)
Following the order of operations (PEMDAS) we start with the multiplication, which is (5x1). We know that 5x1=5, so now we can move on to the division:
5/20, which is equal to 0.25
So now that we know the answer to the equation in the parentheses is 0.25, we can solve the whole equation.
Here is the equation simplified:
4 (0.25)
Because there is now operation indicated between the 4 and the parentheses, we can assume that multiplication is implied, so the final equation is as follows:
4x0.25=1
The final answer is: 1
Hope this helps!
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
<h3>What is the variables about?</h3>
Note that:
y=-8x+4
y-4=-8x
(y-4)/-8=x
Since the independent variable x is known, one can switch the variable labels and thus it will be:
y=(x-4)/-8
f^-1(x)=(x-4)/-8
This can be written again as:
f^-1(x)=(4-x)/8 :P
Thus one can say No, as he forgot to switch the variable labels after solving for the independent variable.
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
See the first part of the question below
Talib is trying to find the inverse of the function to the right. His work appears beneath it. Is his work correct? Explain your answer.
Learn more about variable from
brainly.com/question/4063302
#SPJ1