No. At first it wasn't and then slowly they started to realize how bad it was and created laws and etc to protect the working class.
Answer:
"join together to consider the question of the conservation and use of . . . sources of wealth"
Explanation:
The English common law originated in the early Middle Ages in the King’s Court (Curia Regis), a single royal court set up for most of the country at Westminster, near London. Like many other early legal systems, it did not originally consist of substantive rights but rather of procedural remedies. The working out of these remedies has, over time, produced the modern system in which rights are seen as primary over procedure. Until the late 19th century, English common law continued to be developed primarily by judges rather than legislators.
Answer:
The Battle of Fort Sumter (April 12–13, 1861) was the bombardment of Fort Sumter near Charleston, South Carolina by the South Carolina militia (the Confederate Army did not yet exist), and the return gunfire and subsequent surrender by the United States Army, that started the American Civil War.
Explanation:
What happened at Fort Sumter?
After a 33-hour bombardment by Confederate cannons, Union forces surrender Fort Sumter in South Carolina's Charleston Harbor. The surrender concluded a standoff that began with South Carolina's secession from the Union on December 20, 1860. ...
I would say the best answer to this question would be option C "unelected head of state." Just because monarchy is like a kingdom and the throne can be handed down to anyone who doesn't have to be elected. It isn't none of the other options because the United States has a democracy and also has a constitution, political parties, and representatives who make laws. While monarchy is ran by a king.
Hope this helps.
