Answer: Strict product liability
Explanation:
Strict product liability holds that all merchants sellers of defective and dangerous product are responsible for the outcome of their products regardless of who among them is at fault. The merchants bear the risk for this particular product based on how dangerous they seen to be.
Answer:
company sells a limited quantity of high-unit cost items.
Explanation:
A specific identification method can be defined as a method used for determining the ending inventories cost.
Basically, this type of method for costing inventories typically involves doing a well-detailed physical count of each goods bought on a specific date or a particular period of time, so as to determine the exact number of goods remaining by the end of the year's inventory. Therefore, each of the goods purchased are tagged with their unit price and any other additional charges.
Hence, the specific identification method of costing inventories is used when the company sells a limited quantity of high-unit cost items.
Answer:
d. 4 years.
Explanation:
The payback period is the length of time that it takes for the future cash flows to equal the amount invested in a project. It takes 4 years to get $800,000 for Natal Technologies product.
Answer:
percentage change in the quantity demanded of one good divided by the percentage change in the price of another good.
Explanation:
Demand cross-elasticity is the measure of the relative change in the quantity demanded for a good or service (A) as a function of a certain relative change in the price of another good or service (B) considered to be a substitute for or complementary to the first (A). For example, how much would increase the amount of margarine demanded if there was an increase in the price of butter. The formula for calculating the cross elasticity of demand consists in dividing the relative change in the quantity demanded of a good divided by the relative change in the price of the substitute good.
Answer: Party B
Explanation:
Even though verbal agreements are enforceable by law, written agreements take precedent because they are more explicit than verbal agreements.
The written agreement will therefore be followed in this case and according to this agreement, A will be punished for the proposed action.
If A had tangible proof that a subsequent agreement was reached that would void them of said punishment, they should present it. If they do not, B would prevail.
