Answer:
You can take better notes by writing down the vocab word and the defination and highlight just the word. You can also take color coded notes that will help you become a better notetaker.
Explanation:
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
Answer:Stage of psychosocial development that Lesley is in according to Erik Erikson is referred to as EGO INTEGRITY VS. DESPAIR
Explanation:
Erik Erikson suggests that as we move through different stages of life we experience particular psychological conflict. Through these conflicts we can either conclude positively or negatively.
When people are in their late adulthood their conflict is Ego intergrity versus Despair when someone reflect on their lives in terms of what they have done and achieved or not achieved .
Like Lesley almost everyone at their old age will reflect back on their accomplishments and either be content or be regretfully and unsatisfied
Lesley is proud and content with all her accomplishments in life , she is proud of the choices she made, careers she chose and the family she raised , she has established her Ego integrity since she feels complete.
However if Lesley was not content and regretted the choices that she had made and felt like there was no time left to make up for all those things she couldn't do right and what she has failed to accomplish that will put her on despair
Answer: Christianity, like all other religions, was created for the same reason.
Explanation:
The origins of Christianity date back to the first century AD. The emergence of one such religion is multiple, but they do not differ from the emergence of other religions. People form their religious attitudes from several factors. Religion is primarily the result of man's fear of death. In this way, people believe that their existence in this world is not in vain and that if they follow certain rules, they will have a reward after death. Death as one great unknown encourages people to believe. Unknown events and what they could not define people often attributed to the divine. The prehistory man did not understand the thunder and the appearance of the sun, so he adored the sky.
