In this question the options are missing; here are the options:
The Spanish king adopted which of the following policies for enslaved Africans who escaped English territory to St. Augustine, Florida?
A. Slaves escaping from the English were freed
B. Slaves escaping from the English were executed
C. Slaves escaping from the English were sold to the Caribbean
D. Slaves escaping from the English were exchanged for Spanish prisoners of war
The correct answer is A. Slaves escaping from the English were freed
Explanation:
During the colonization process, Spanish explores settled in different territories in America, including territories located in the South of the U.S. This included the territories of modern states such as Texas, Louisiana, New Mexico, California, among others. Moreover, these territories were controlled by the Spanish Crown and due to this, policies were different from the ones in the territories colonized by England or France. In terms of slavery, spanish colonizers also used slaves as labor force; however, it was established slaves from English territory that escaped to Florida were freed under the condition they accepted the new government and converted to catholicism. According to this, the correct answer is A.
There is a violent spirit of opposition raised on the Continent against the execution of the Stamp Act, the mob in Boston have carried it very high against Mr. Oliver the Secry (a Town born child) for his acceptance of an office in consequence of that act. They have even proceeded to some violence, and burnt him in Effigy &c. They threaten to pull down & burn the Stamp Office now building, and that they will hold every man as Infamous that shall presume to carry the Stamp Act into Execution; so that it is thought Mr. Oliver will resign. I don’t find any such turbulent spirit to prevail among us, if it should, the means are in our Hands to prevent any tumults or Insults; what the consequences may be in the Colonies who have no military force to keep the rabble in order, I cannot pretend to say.
In a sense yes because it was very affective and powerful, but overall no, it was not very morally acceptable
It was led by a dictator.
fuehrer
is a German word meaning "leader" or "guide". ... However, because of its strong association with Hitler, the isolated word itself usually has negative connotations when used with the meaning of "leader", especially in political contexts
another answer could b wolf
