Answer:
i think they should be able to. we just need a different bed room for them or sum.
you want zoom?
993-2087-328 and pw is: 2HXuqV
Explanation:
He explained culture and ideology in a way anyone could understand it
The Mediterranean Sea separated the Greek islands. These islands grew into separate city-states as they were separated by the sea.
The hills and mountains in Greece separated the individual city-states. These cities were separated by these hills and mountains, which led to them developing into different city-states.
Answer:
C)John Adams helped make peace with the British, D)George Washington led the continental Army, after the Revolution is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The passage refers to the American revolution and why it was started. The colonialists rebelled because the King failed secure their future. He harmed them with unjust taxes and laws.
During the revolution John Adams was appointed to negotiate with the British after the revolution. Later he returned to Massachusetts and got elected as a delegate to the state convention for crafting new constitution.
George Washington was made the commander in chief for the continental army. He was given priority over John Hancock because of his previous military experience and also because the congressmen thought that as he was a leader from Virginia, he could help to unite all the colonies.
Answer:
Explanation:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.
In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.
What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.
