Answer:
Policeman A = 56 tickets
Step-by-step explanation:
Policemen A + B = 70
If Policeman B hands out x no of tickets...
Then Policeman A hands out 4x no of tickets
meaning...
x + 4x = 70
5x = 70
x = 70/5
x = 14
Therefore Policeman A hands out..
4x = 4 × 14 = 56 tickets
Answer:
The answer is C. 16x² - 56xy + 49y²
Step-by-step explanation:
A perfect square trinomial is the result of a squared binomial, the perfect square trinomial would be a² + 2ab + b², as that is what you get when you expand the brackets.
With annual compounding, the number of years for 1000 to become 1400 is 6.7 years
With continous compounding, the number of years for 1000 to become 1400 is 1.35 years
<h3>How long would it take $1000 to become $1,400?</h3>
With annual compounding, the formula that would be used is:
(In FV / PV) / r
Where:
- FV = future value
- PV = present value
- r = interest rate
(In 1400 / 1000) / 0.05 = 6.7 years
With continous compounding, the formula that would be used is:
(In 1400 / 1000) / (In e^r)
Where r = interest rate
((In 1400 / 1000) / (In e^0.05) = 1.35 years
To learn more about how to determine the number of years, please check: : brainly.com/question/21841217
#SPJ1
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
This explanation mostly depends on what you're learning right now. The first way would be to convert this matrix to a system of equations like this.
g + t + k = 90
g + 2t - k = 55
-g - t + 3k = 30
Then you solve using normal methods of substitution or elimination. It seems to me that elimination is the quickest method.
g + t + k = 90
-g - t + 3k = 30
____________
0 + 0 + 4k = 120
4k = 120
k = 30
No you can plug this into the first two equations
g + t + (30) = 90
g + t = 60
and
g + 2t - (30) = 55
g + 2t = 85
now use elimination again by multiplying the first equation by -1
g + 2t = 85
-g - t = -60
_________
0 + t = 25
t = 25
Now plug those both back into one of the equations. I'll just do the first one.
g + (25) + (30) = 90
g = 35
Therefore, we know that Ted spent the least amount of time on the computer.
The second method is using matrix reduction and getting the matrix in the row echelon form, therefore solving using the gauss jordan method. If you would like me to go through this instead, please leave a comment.
I’m not sure if this is a question, but yes, i like to use “PEMDAS”.
Parentheses, exponents, multiply, divide, add, subtract.
You always go in order from left to right!
