The only one with low language diversity is japan, the other two speak may languages.
Part 2:
If a working person<span> is </span>fired this implies<span> that </span>they're going to have no financial gain to live<span> off, to </span>that they might have to be compelled to rely on somebody else like<span> family or friends. </span>
<span>Unemployment </span>will have an effect on<span> businesses </span>as a result of<span> there would be fewer </span>staff to figure therefore<span> there would be less production, fewer production </span>suggests that<span> less </span>cash<span> for the business.</span>
<span>The </span>method unemployment<span> affects </span>the govt is that a lot of those that are fired means a lot of folks<span> on welfare, </span>this implies that<span> </span>the govt can have to be compelled to<span> pay </span>more cash<span> to support them.</span>
Part 3:
<span>Being </span>unemployed will<span> cause </span>an enormous quantity<span> of stress and presumably</span> will cause<span> depression. If there </span>aren't<span> enough </span>workers<span> the remaining one’swill </span>have to be compelled to try and fill certain gaps, which may<span> be overwhelming and </span>nerve-racking<span>. The economy would </span>begin<span> to fall. The </span>state will have an effect on<span> the </span>working person<span> in </span>ways that like<span> if they did manage to snag smaller jobs </span>they might<span> get less pay and </span>should realize ways that to form<span> ends meet.
T</span>he state <span>could </span>additionally have an effect on<span> a business by if the business was cutting </span>folks inflicting<span> the </span>state and others noticed<span>, it </span>might<span> get viewed badly and lose customers. </span>the govt<span> would </span>even be<span> affected since the taxation would</span><span> lower </span>also<span>.</span>
Answer: Umm hi again social rights is rights arising from the social contact. Tip- Google is your friend. Also I was not able to really chose an answer because there were no answer choses. But this a point of view. Hope u do well!
Idkkkkkkkkkkk......................... sorrrryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyys
Answer:
not a violation of antitrust law
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario this refusal is most likely not a violation of antitrust law. That is because these laws are designed to promote competition. Therefore since they are one of many producers, refusal to sell is not a violation. The Port Harbor Restaurant Corporation can obtain another provider.