Answer:
sexual orientation.
Explanation:
sexual orientation -
It refers to the identity of a person to get attracted to a male , female or both , is referred to as sexual orientation.
The process is gender dependent practice.
Where a homosexual person is supposed to be attracted to people of same gender ,
where as a hetyerosexual person gets attracted to opposite gender.
And ,
Bisexual is supposed to get attracted to both the gender .
Hence, from the given scenario of the question,
The correct answer is sexual orientation .
Answer:
a conditioned stimulus
Explanation:
Ivan Pavlov was a great psychologist who has discovered the theory of classical conditioning while experimenting with dogs and has given a few important terms in the theory including conditioned and unconditioned stimulus and response.
Conditioned stimulus: According to Pavlov's experiment on classical conditioning, the term conditioned stimulus is defined as a formerly neutral stimulus after getting connected with an unconditioned stimulus gives rise to a conditioned response.
In the question above, the statement signifies that the sound of the bell is a conditioned stimulus.
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
