32 times 2 is equal to 64
Answer:
well... x is 35 if that's what your'e asking :)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The equation does not have a real root in the interval ![\rm [0,1]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Crm%20%5B0%2C1%5D)
Step-by-step explanation:
We can make use of the intermediate value theorem.
The theorem states that if
is a continuous function whose domain is the interval [a, b], then it takes on any value between f(a) and f(b) at some point within the interval. There are two corollaries:
- If a continuous function has values of opposite sign inside an interval, then it has a root in that interval. This is also known as Bolzano's theorem.
- The image of a continuous function over an interval is itself an interval.
Of course, in our case, we will make use of the first one.
First, we need to proof that our function is continues in
, which it is since every polynomial is a continuous function on the entire line of real numbers. Then, we can apply the first corollary to the interval
, which means to evaluate the equation in 0 and 1:

Since both values have the same sign, positive in this case, we can say that by virtue of the first corollary of the intermediate value theorem the equation does not have a real root in the interval
. I attached a plot of the equation in the interval
where you can clearly observe how the graph does not cross the x-axis in the interval.
Answer:
y=88 x=42
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the total measurments of one triangle have to equal 180 and one angle is already 50, and the angle on the oppisite side of the y angle is 90 the only logical number for y would be 88. Hope this helped :)
No. the product stays the same because it is still the same number, just in fraction form.