Not much is known about how the earliest civilizations adapted to their environments except through their cultural habits (i.e. religion, games, etc). The Mayans took advantage of the surrounding rain forests and developed a very heavy agricultural and farming civilization, focusing in the cultivation of maize, beans, squash, peppers, avocado, and other important foods. They created a system for tearing down the rain forest in order to make room for their fields and left the watering of the plants up to the gods as they believed that the sun and rain were entirely divine. The Aztecs, however, settled in a more marshy land that was difficult to cultivate. Instead, they relied on military power and strength to conquer other civilizations and steal their food to keep their civilization alive. They did a bit of growing on their own, but not to the same scale as the Mayans, developing water ways and canals to transport goods from conquered cities to their capital.
The answer is: The cognitive-mediational theory suggests that our emotions are determined by our appraisal of the stimulus while the facial feedback hypothesis does not.
To put it simply, The cognitive-meditational theory infers that the facial expression that we made could not influence the emotion that we felt.
The facial feedback hypothesis, on the other hand, believes that the expression that we made throughout the day could affect our emotions. (if we force ourself to smile throughout the day we will feel happier and handle our stress better)
I believe it is defacto segregation rather than dejure segregation (by law)
social perspectives is the way of looking at the society and the social behaviour.
hope it helped. :) if it did please mark brainliest.