<span>According to carl jung, the collective unconscious of the human mind is made up of "archetypes".
Collective unconscious refers to a term which is used by Carl Jung, alludes to structures of the oblivious personality which are shared among creatures of similar species. As indicated by Jung, the human collective unconscious is populated by impulses and by archetypes: widespread images, for example, The Great Mother, the Wise Old Man, the Shadow, the Tower etc.
</span>
Social Cogitation is the effect of others on our
behavior
The federalist papers were a collection of essays that promoted the ratification of the US Constitution in the 1700s. They were written by <span>Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison, all Federalists.
Hope this helps :)</span>
Neoliberalism is a political theory that left negative consequences on education because it turned it into a competition among students.
Neoliberalism is a term to refer to the political and economic theory that proposes that the State should minimize the economic issues of a country.
Therefore, neoliberalism supports economic freedom and the free market whose basic pillars are
- Privatization
- Deregulation
Neoliberal education then is the education in which ideas related to neoliberalism are imparted to students. Due to the above, the idea that school is a competition spread and its main purpose is to see who is the best. This has caused students to become unconcerned about their learning and focus on getting good grades without actually learning.
Note: This question is incomplete because the text is missing. However, I can answer it based on my general prior knowledge.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/23042803
Relations among Muslims, Jews, and Christians have been shaped not only by the theologies and beliefs of the three religions, but also, and often more strongly, by the historical circumstances in which they are found. As a result, history has become a foundation for religious understanding. In each historical phase, the definition of who was regarded as Muslim, Jewish, or Christian shifted, sometimes indicating only a religious identification, but more often indicating a particular social, economic, or political group.
While the tendency to place linguistic behaviour, religious identity, and cultural heritage under one, pure definition has existed for a very long time, our modern age with its ideology of nationalism is particularly prone to such a conflation. Ethnic identities have sometimes been conflated with religious identities by both outsiders and insiders, complicating the task of analyzing intergroup and intercommunal relations. For example, Muslims have often been equated with Arabs, effacing the existence of Christian and Jewish Arabs (i.e., members of those religions whose language is Arabic and who participate primarily in Arab culture), ignoring non-Arab Muslims who constitute the majority of Muslims in the world. In some instances, relations between Arabs and Israelis have been understood as Muslim-Jewish relations, ascribing aspects of Arab culture to the religion of Islam and Israeli culture to Judaism. This is similar to what happened during the Crusades, during which Christian Arabs were often charged with being identical to Muslims by the invading Europeans. While the cultures in which Islam predominates do not necessarily make sharp distinctions between the religious and secular aspects of the culture, such distinctions make the task of understanding the nature of relations among Muslims, Jews, and Christians easier, and therefore will be used as an analytic tool in this chapter.
