Answer:
The correct option is (A) more, greater
Explanation:
According to the risk return trade off, the risk is increased with the return that means if the returns are increased the risk is also increased and vice versa
So as per the given scenario, if there is more risk that investor wants to accept so the return should be more for the investment. This represents the direct relationship between the risk and return of the investment
hence, the correct option is (A) more, greater
Answer:
a) diluted earnings per share = 0
Explanation:
Diluted earnings per share (DEPS) is a recalculation of the basic EPS. The difference between DEPS and EPS is, EPS represents the current position of earnings per share. No changes in number shares and/or earnings in the future are incorporated in the basic EPS.
Whereas DEPS is a representation of not only the current position of earnings and shares but also includes the commitments an entity has already made whose occurrence may result in an increase/decrease in the amount of earnings and/or number of shares. For example, in the question Culver Company has issued 10-year convertible bonds which right now have no impact on basic EPS but if in the future these bond holders exercise their right of conversion, this would result in an increase in number of ordinary shares hence decreasing/diluting the basic EPS. The entities use DEPS to show shareholders the impact of such commitments on the basic EPS to improve their decision making.
So in 2017 none of the bonds were converted therefore no diluted earnings per share is calculated in 2017.
If all of the bonds were converted in 2017 the DEPS would have been calculated as follows:
The formula for calculating DEPS is as follows;
DEPS = (Net income + interest savings) ÷ number of ordinary shares + increase in ordinary shares as a result of conversion.
Tax savings as a result of conversion=$128400 ($2140000×6%). Because if bond holders convert into ordinary shares then Culver company will not have to pay them interest and hence the amount of interest is saved.
Increase in ordinary shares upon conversion= 29960 ($2140000÷$1000=2140 bonds. Each bond is convertible into 14 shares therefore, 2140×14=29960).
Now Lets calculate DEPS as follows;
DEPS = ($296000+$128400) ÷ 91000+29960
DEPS =$424400÷120960
DEPS = $3.5
Grocery stores are likely to hold<u> anticipation</u> inventory of candies to meet the extra demand during Halloween.
Halloween's origins may be traced returned to the historical Celtic pageant referred to as Samhain, which become held on November 1 in modern-day calendars. It become believed that on that day, the souls of the useless returned to their homes, so humans wore costumes and lit bonfires to ward off spirits.
Halloween, a contraction of All Hallows' Eve, a holiday discovered on October 31, the nighttime before All Saints' (or All Hallows') Day. The party marks the day earlier than the Western Christian dinner party of All Saints and initiates the season of Allhallowtide, which lasts three days and concludes with All Souls' Day.
Halloween Ends is an upcoming American slasher film directed via David Gordon Green and written by using inexperienced, Danny McBride, Paul Brad Logan, and Chris Bernier. it's far a sequel to 2021's Halloween Kills and the thirteenth installment within the Halloween franchise.
Learn more about Halloween here brainly.com/question/18459726
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. $60.
Explanation:
While computing the relevant cost in case of special order only the variable manufacturing cost is to be considered as it will be changed in special order case.
And the other cot like - fixed manufacturing, variable & fixed selling, traceable fixed administrative cost, etc are not relevant as it remains constant
These costs are not useful for decision making. Hence, it is to be ignored
Answer: (E) none of the other choices
Explanation:
None of the options are correct in the above question.
The USA extends Most Favoured Nation Status to most countries in the world including Germany so that would not be a reason for the car's not to pass through customs.
The cars could indeed be a threat to national security. Just because they come from a safe country does not mean that they were not tampered with. They need to be properly inspected.
They are indeed a source of competition for US automakers but that would be no reason to stop them. Perhaps tariffs could be applied on them but they will not be stopped.
There is no provision in US Customs practices that prohibits the importation of used cars solely because they are used cars therefore it will not be a reason to halt the car's going through customs.
None of the options are therefore correct.
