Answer:
B. Accept Reject
Explanation:
As we can see that the home computer has the earning of 10% and its return on investment is increased to 13% so it is a better choice for division of home computer to accept the investment and the other division i.e. gaming division should reject the proposal as it is already earned the 20% and if it is accepted so it decreased the return on investment
Therefore the option B is correct
Answer:
Consumer surplus increases by $2
Explanation:
The consumer surplus can be defined as the benefit that consumers gain when they pay less for a good that they are willing to pay more for.
a). Determine the final demand as follows;
Price elasticity of demand=% change in price/% change in demand
where;
price elasticity of demand=-1
% change in price={(Final price-initial price)/initial price}×100
Final price=$24
initial price=$25
% change in price=(24-25)/25=(1/25)×100=-4%
% change in demand=x
replacing in the original expression;
-1=-4/x
x=4%
% change in quantity={final quantity-initial quantity/initial quantity}×100
let final quantity=y
4%={(y-100)/100}×100
0.04=(y-100)/100
4=y-100
y=4+100=104
final quantity=104 units
Consumer surplus=(1/2)×change in price×change in quantity
where;
change in price=25-24=1
change in quantity=104-100=4
Consumer surplus=(1/2)×1×4=2
Consumer surplus increases by $2
Answer:
The incomplete part of the question is "Using a cap-and-trade system of tradable emission allowances will eliminate half of the sulfur dioxide pollution at a cost of $1 million per year. If the permits are not tradable, what will be the cost of eliminating half of the pollution? If permits cannot be traded, then the cost of the pollution reduction will be $1 million per year." The full question is attched as picture as well
1) Tradable permit system
Then lower MAC firm will abate the all pollution units
Then as MAC1 = $250, MAC2 = $275
Firm 1 = Consolidated electric
Firm 2 = Commonwealth utility
Then 1 will sell all permits to 2, at a price between $250 & $275.
So total cost of abatement of 20 units = MAC1 * 20
= $250 * 20 Unit
= $5,000
2) Non-tradable permits
Total cost = MC1*10 + MC2*10
= $2,500 + $2,750
= $5,250
Answer:
The answer is: remain the same
Explanation:
The marginal utility of a good or service is how much better we feel when consuming an extra unit of that good or service. For example if we are very thirsty, the marginal utility of consuming a can of Coke is very large, but once our thirst is quenched, an extra can of Coke will not provide use with that much satisfaction as before.
If the price of a substitute good increases, the marginal utility of the good whose price didn't change, will remain the same.
Let's go back to the Coke example. An extra can of Coke will give me 5 more satisfaction units (I'm assuming I can measure satisfaction) and an extra slice of pizza will give me 7 more units of satisfaction. If the price of Coke increases from 50 cents to $1, its marginal utility will decrease. I will buy more pizza because the satisfaction I get from drinking Coke is now smaller.
Answer:
$50,400
Explanation:
Cash Balance as per bank statement $62,900
[$69700+$25300-$20400+$87600-$99300]
Less: Outstanding checks at April 30, 2020 <u>$12,500</u>
Adjusted Cash balance per bank <u>$50,400</u>
So, the cash balance per books at April 30, 2020 is $50,400
