I don't know your scenario, but I can give an example for discussing federalism, and hope that it will be helpful to you!
The main effect that the the division of power between the federal and state governments has on its citizens is that the lives of the citizens differ depending on the state they live in.
Let's take the death penalty: people living in a state with this penalty can fear being falsely condemned to it (happens often!) and the people who live elsewhere don't need to fear it.
Also, let's take possesion of small amounts of marihuana: a person would be punished differently for it, depending on the state they live in.
Answer:
D.110
Explanation:
They had 6.5 instead of 65.
Number of production shortage
65/6.5=10
Now this is equal to 10 × 10 + 10
=110
Answer: $66,810,000
Explanation: take the balance at the beginning of the year add it to the net income from statement of comprehensive incomes then minus the cash dividends declared from the total of the beginning balance and net income then get the retained balance at the end of the 20Y3 year of 66 810 000.
The stock dividends of 2,600,000 have two accounts involved which is stock( inventory) and dividends declared which is an liability.
Sumter Pumps Corporation
retained income statement for the year ending 31 december 20Y3
balance 01/jan/20Y3 $59,650,000
CHANGES IN EQUITY
Net Income 8,160,000
dividends paid and declared
Cash dividend 1,000,000
stock dividend 0
balance 31 dec 20Y3 $66,810,000
Answer:
The matter was handled really unfairly
Explanation:
Exuberance in a statement are usually identified by the use of the words - really and completely.
These words tend to give an expression of making excess effort in doing something. So exuberance is not controlled.
Overuse of intensifiers in a sentence shows exuberance and this is not ideal in business communication.
Various intensifiers include - very, definitely, really, actually, totally, extremely, and completely.
dude thats easy all u have to do is multiply 40 and 50