Let Kamil get x. Therefore Sean would get (x + 56).
Kamil and Sean are in the ratio: 3:5
That means: x : (x + 56) = 3 : 5
x / (x + 56) = 3/5
5*x = 3*(x + 56)
5x = 3*x + 3*56
5x = 3x + 168
5x - 3x = 168
2x = 168
x = 168 / 2
x = 84
Therefore Kamil had, x = 84, and Sean had (x + 56) = 84 + 56 = 140
Kamil had $84 and Sean had $140
Note what i actually represents.
i is the very basis of a whole new level of counting. When finding discriminants, we often say that a quadratic has no
real roots if the discriminant is 0. Needless to say, there are roots, they are just imaginary.
, in real terms, is non-existent. That is, there are no numbers in the real number system that when multiplied by itself produces a result of -1. This is what i unit represents.
Let's tackle this problem in smaller steps.
Let's first expand our brackets.
(i - 7i)² = (-6i)² = 36i²
Now, let's distribute the xi.
xi(i - 7i)² = xi(36i²) = 36xi³ =
= -36xi
3x=5x+18
3x-3x=5x-3x+18
0=2x+18
0-18=2x+18-18
-18=2x
-18÷2=2x÷2
-9=x
Hope this helps!
Vote me brainliest!
Answer:
C.Two triangles thatvhave all congruent anglea and all the sides are proportional.
well, let's take a look at the table
is g(x) increasing from -2 to -1? hmmm from when x = -2 g(x) = 2, then when x = -1, g(x) = -3, hold the mayo!! it went from 2 to -3, that's just going down, so, nope is not.
is itdecreasing from -1 to 0? hmmm x = -1, g(x) = -3, as x = 0, g(x) = 2, wait a second!!! it went from -3 to 2, it really went up, so nope, is not decreasing on that interval.
is it increasing from 0 to 1? let's see, as x = 0, g(x) = 2, as x = 1, g(x) = 17, woahhh!!, it went from 2 and rocketted to 17, yeap, it is increasing as x = 0 to x = 1.