The economic value of having colonies in the first place was for 3 main reasons
1) attain cheap labour from the native peoples
2) acquire cheap raw materials to bring to the homeland (Europe)
3) open up new markets to trade with
the first two were vital in Britains industrial revolution. Without cheap raw materials, and cheap labourers, the factories and refineries in Britain would have costed far more to maintain and keep supplied. This, in turn, would have slowed down production considerably. There is no doubt in my mind that the industrial revolution would still have taken place in Britain with or without the colonies, but WITH the colonies the process was sped up considerably.
Overall, cheap labour and raw materials attained through Britains colonial interests sped up the industrialisation of the UK.
Is the definition whistleblowing/whistleblower ? i am not sure sorry
Answer:
2nd, 3rd,5th
Explanation:
i got them all right on edge
hope this helps:)
A common issue in wars between Britain and France and the 1700s was which rulers would lead European kingdoms.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
For a very long time France and Britain have a history of fighting a lot of wars. Although they fought a lot of wars, it was not fought individually but rather with the help of allies. Both France and Britain made allies to strengthen their armed forces to fight their rivals.
However a common confusion that existed amongst all of them was who will lead the armies to the war. This was a common problem for both of them, be it for Britain or for France.
Philosophy because the acient greeks thought the planets were gods to some sort and it was proven right they created the math we use today
