1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kari74 [83]
3 years ago
9

Which statement best describes the significance of the magna carta? Pleasee

History
2 answers:
alina1380 [7]3 years ago
6 0

Although i doubt it;

I think the option is B.

It established that no one, Not even the king is above the law.

Hope it helps...

Regards;

Leukonov/Olegion.

Allisa [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B. It established that no one, not even a king, is above the law

Explanation:

The Magna Carta (1215) was a charter of rights written by a group of Barons of England that were tired of King John’s tyrannic rule. The charter established a more powerful parliament, granted some liberties of free men, such as the right to a trial by jury before punishment, and reduced the power of King John, whose rule was perceived as abusive.

Its significance lies in the fact that it set limits on the power of the British monarchy by making the King subject to the law, meaning that from that point on, the British crown had to be accountable for its actions under the law, just like everyone else.

You might be interested in
Which of the following is an example of apartheid?
erastova [34]
Blacks had to carry passes at all times and live on "reserves"
3 0
3 years ago
How is the free soil party different from the know nothing party?
umka21 [38]

Answer:

The Know-Nothing Party was established in 1850.

In July of 1844, riots broke out in the city of Philadelphia. Nativists battled Irish immigrants which resulted up to two Catholic churches and a Catholic school being burned down.

The Know-Nothing Party was was an outgrowth of the strong anti-immigrant people.

In 1843, The Know-Nothings formed the American Republic Party.

1854 they had allied themselves with groups within another political party called the Whigs.

In 1855, The Know-Nothings dropped much of their secrecy and became known as the American Party.

FREE-SOILER PARTY

The Free-Soiler Party was a short political party in the US during 1848-1852 presidential elections

It was the 3rd largest party that grew it's greatest strength from New York.

The party leadership consisted of former anti-slavery members of the Whig Party and the Democratic Party.

Its main purpose was opposing the expansion of slavery into the western territories, arguing that free men on free soil comprised a morally and economically superior system to slavery.

Its presidential nominee in 1848, Martin Van Buren, received 291,616 votes against Zachary Taylor of the Whigs and Lewis Cass of the Democrats, but Van Buren received no electoral votes. The Party's "spoiler" effect in 1848 may have put Zachary Taylor into office in a narrowly-contested election.

The Compromise of 1850 temporarily neutralized the issue of slavery and undercut the party's no-compromise position. Most Barnburners returned to the Democratic party, and the Free Soil Party became dominated by ardent anti-slavery leaders.

The Free Soil Party was a notable third party. More successful than most, it sent two Senators and fourteen Representatives to the thirty-first Congress, which convened from March 4, 1849 to March 3, 1851.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the collapse of the western Roman Empire affect Europe? {2.7} *
kow [346]

Explanation:

The collapse of Rome have ushered in the other important time in European history capitalism. If Roman empire fell, Europe was thrown into a perpetual state of fighting. For centuries, feudalism probably prevented another powerful centralized government, such as Rome's, from emerging in Europe.

6 0
3 years ago
List the 3 factors of production.
kicyunya [14]

Answer:

The factors of production include land, labor, capital

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The rulers of Italy before the Romans were the _____.
Rasek [7]
The rulers of Italy before the Romans were the "Etruscans", although it should be noted that the Etruscan dominance of the region was not even close to the Romans' in terms of power and political nature. 
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • President Wilson’s proposal to form the League of Nations was most weakened by
    6·1 answer
  • The persistence and perseverance of American homesteaders in the late 1800s.
    9·2 answers
  • How do you use self incrimination in a sentence?
    6·1 answer
  • 2 Points
    7·2 answers
  • To strengthen Judah spiritually, priests and teachers were sent throughout the land by _____ to teach the Law of the Lord.
    13·1 answer
  • I need help pleaseeeeeeeeee
    10·1 answer
  • ITS NOT B please explain​
    15·1 answer
  • Which option best completes this table? (Picture included)
    15·1 answer
  • How did Mali promote the spread of Islam in Africa?
    11·2 answers
  • What was the beginning of the u. S. Constitution called.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!