Alcohol is a solvent and it basically dissolves anything. A lead is spongy and full of holes. When the leaf is mixed with alcohol, the alcohol affects the leaves. The alcohol melts the pigments of the leaf, chlorophyll, which is the green part. This will turn the alcohol green
Anything can come out of that but I think type b might be more possible to happen.
C Skin Cancer! uv rays are very bad
The question is incomplete as it does not have the options which are:
A. The threefold change happened in one concentrated burst.
B. The change was not consistent in direction, but happened in multiple bursts concentrated at each speciation event.
C. There was consistent directional selection toward a larger brain all along the lineage between the two species.
D. None of the above.
Answer:
Option-B
Explanation:
The hominids evolved with time and the known hominid in modern time is the Homo sapiens or modern human.
The Homo sapiens like other species could have evolved from the older species through speciation and studies suggest that one of the major factors of human evolution is the size of the brain.
Two possibilities could explain the size of the brain that it could have evolved slowly with time called the gradual equilibrium or in bursts concentrated at each speciation event.
Since the punctuated equilibrium takes place in bursts until the species reach stasis is the most applicable condition for punctuated equilibrium to happen therefore Option-B is the correct answer.
Answer: A federally funded research study involving children 8 to 12 years old involves collecting a single voided urine sample to assess the frequency of asymptomatic <em>proteinuria</em>.
Your IRB has determined that assent of children age 8 and older is required for the study. A 10 year old firmly declined to participate in the study.
The best procedure that describes the <u>action </u>to be taken by the investigator is:
- Honor the Childs decision .
Explanation:
The <em>purpose</em> of the IRB is to <em>assure that appropriate steps are taken</em> to <em>protect the rights </em>and welfare of humans participating as subjects in a research study. It promotes <em>fully informed and voluntary participation</em> by prospective subjects capable of making such choices (or, if that is not possible, informed permission given by a suitable proxy), and seeks to maximize the safety of subjects.
The capacity admits degrees. The same patient may be able to decide certain things and not others. So, the more transcendent or delicate a decision is, the higher the level of capacity required must be. When the patient <u>is not capable, it is up to his relatives to make the decisions.</u>