Well, it is strongly suggested by your point of view. However, considering the alternatives I will assume that you are after potensiell positive effects.
I would first and firemost mention Job creation as a effect. This is due to new productive and innovative perspective which priarily focus on expanding the financial capital; in this way provide facilities and cultivate nationalism.
The break even point in composite units is 5000 units.
Break even point
The Break-even point is calculated by dividing the fixed cost by the contribution margin per unit.
For this sales mix, the contribution margin per unit is the aggregate of each contribution margin. Contribution margin is calculated by subtracting variable cost from the selling price
Contribution margin for A is $20- $12 = $8 x 3 units
Contribution margin for B is $ 30 - $18 = $12 x 2 units
Contribution margin for C is $40 -$24= $16 x 1 unit
Total contribution margin per unit will be
(8 x 3) x (12 x 2 ) x( $16 x 1)= $64
Break-even point = $320,000 /64
Learn more about break even point here :
brainly.com/question/15356272
#SPJ4
Answer: continuous production process
Explanation: In simple words, it refers to a production process in which the organisation has to keep doing the production due to the potential loss of of degradation of the raw materials or any other such factors.
In the given case, the company is able to produce efficiently only if they produce in large quantities.
Hence they should indulge in continuous production process.
Answer:
Explanation:
1st strategy : Selling pound forward
The spot rate of the pound is quoted at $1.51.
The one-year forward rate exhibits a 2.65% premium.
The one-year forward rate = 1.51 ( 1+ 0.0265)
= $ 1.55
Dollars received = 100000 * 1.55 = $155000
2nd strategy : Buying put option
The strike price of put = $1.54
premium on option is $.03
Amount received per option = $ 1.54 - $ 0.03 =$1.51
Total Dollars received = 100000* 1.51 = $ 151000
the best possible hedging strategy is Selling pound forward and receiving $155000
The U.S. Supreme Court determine that the federal government did not overstep its bounds under the commerce clause when it enacted the Controlled Substances Act of 1970- Gonzalez v. Raich Case
Explanation:
<u>Gonzales v. Raich</u> was a case in which Raich was permitted to grow and use Marijuana for medical purposes but the federal agents seized the marijuana plantation and destroyed it.
<u>Raich then seeked action under the federal Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act (CFA).
In the decision taken by the U.S Supreme court under the commerce clause of the US Constitution,that the congress has the power to criminalize the use and production of home-grown marijuana even if state law allows its use for medicinal purposes.</u>
