Answer:
1. to enact (keep the pattern of using the word "to" before the verb)
2. three of his ribs (keep the pattern of listing numbers of bones broken)
3. that they have rested properly (all items are in the same tense "they have")
4. jumping a burning fire (keep the pattern of verbs in the present tense)
5. whirred loudly (keep list in the past tense "last night")
Explanation:
Answer:
The author means that when people with power attempt to be fair they will be torn between two groups the people (critics) who feel that their choice is incorrect and the ones who feel that it is correct due to the situation. So kind of like the subject of bringing beheading back in the US many feel it is a horrible idea but many also feel it is correct. And for the second one, I am not sure because I have not read your article only the seventh paragraph.
Answer:
A.
Explanation: In any argument, you should avoid not mentioning any other POVs in a said argument.
Details are necessary for most writing pieces.
Atrocious is a very extreme way to say horrible
The statements about a moral dilemma that applies to the character of Mark Antony are:
- D) He has to decide whether to go to war with the conspirators.
- E) He has to decide whether or not to support the assassins.
<h3>What is a Moral Dilemma?</h3>
This refers to the confusion that a person faces when he is at crossroads and does not know the right moral decision to take.
Hence, we can see that from the complete text, there is the narration of the conspiracy and murder of Julius Caesar and how Mark Antony is confused on whether he should go to war with the conspirators or not.
Read more about moral dilemmas here:
brainly.com/question/12425265
#SPJ4
