If your target audience is neutral because they do not know enough about the topic to have formed an opinion, they are <u>neutral audience</u>.
<h3>What is a neutral audience?</h3>
A neutral audience is typically one that is uninformed about the subject and has not yet formed an opinion. Our two tasks are to "educate" the audience and win them on to our point of view. But this instance of "informing" won't be as impartial as one that is strictly informational.
Instead, we present the material to the audience in a way that is compatible with the viewpoint we are promoting. We then give the audience arguments for agreeing with the position being promoted.
Learn more about neutral audience
brainly.com/question/473664
#SPJ4
a. True. Court's review of the decision may be more restricted in scope than an apellate court's review of a trial court's decision.
The answer would be the second (2nd) statement. Programs to fight HIV/AIDS have been the most help in breaking the cycle of poverty and disease in Botswana. These programs helped raise awareness about the devastating causes and effects of these to poverty and disease-spreading.
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
The ethos is portrayed by questioning about the issue. She presents how is aware of what is going on, however she does not have a stance on it. She displays a very demanding and urgent tone towards her husband. She is caring with him and she starts questioning about him. She continues in hopes that he is safe and careful.
