It was the first U.S. Supreme Court<span> case to apply the principle of "judicial review".</span>
- Long skirts swept the ground and carried dirt and filth which led to illned
- Skirts were usually voluminous and difficult to handle
- These dresses created problem while working
Answer:
Because it requires us to make personal sacrifice to help other.
Explanation:
Christian charism is a concept in Christianity that refers to a power given by the holy spirit for us to be used on our day to day life.
Humans are naturally a selfish creature. We have a huge tendency to think only about ourselves while sacrificing other people. Having the kindness to sacrifice our own comfort for others can be seen as a sign of holy spirit entering our life. It gave Christians the strength to overlook their own needs for the benefit of others who might need it more.
Answer:
Answer Expert Verified
hello here your answer and please mark me as brainlest
Both English philosophers, Hobbes and Locke, believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in Leviathan in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his Two Treatises on Civil Government in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching about Hobbes and Locke, I've often described the difference between them in this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
Explanation:
The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921 was awarded to Albert Einstein "for his accommodations to Theoretical Physics, and especially for his revelation of the law of the photoelectric effect". Albert Einstein received his Nobel Prize one year later, in 1922.
