1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pani-rosa [81]
3 years ago
10

Use the following two links to answer the following questions: Nominal Wages (W) Price index CPI (P) a) (5 points) Calculate the

real wage (W/P) the first month of the recession 12/07 and compare it to the last month of the recession 6/09. What is the percent change in the real wage during this most recent recession
Business
1 answer:
g100num [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

3.45%

Explanation:

the real wage at the beginning of the recession (12/07) = nominal wage / price index Dec. 2007 = $17.70 / 2.1141 = $8.3721

the real wage at the end of the recession (6/09) = nominal wage / price index June 2009 = $18.53 / 2.14527= $8.6609

% change in real wage = [($8.6609 - $8.3721) / $8.3721] x 100 = 3.44955% = 3.45%

Due to the recession, the price index changed less than the nominal wages since the inflation rate was very low. It is normal that during recessions, specially severe ones, the inflation rate decreases or even turns negative (what happened in Europe in those years).

You might be interested in
group of winning ticket holders share equally in a ​$35 comma 000 comma 000 lottery. Before the money is​ divided, two more winn
hoa [83]

Answer:

The answer is: The original group of lottery winners was made up of 5 people.

Explanation:

The total prize amount was $35,000,000 with each original winning ticket holder earning $7,000,000.

                    $35,000,000 / 5 = $7,000,000 for each winner

When 2 more winning ticket holders show up, the total prize has to be redivided to include them.

                     $35,000,000 / 7 = $5,000,000 for each winner

6 0
3 years ago
Suppose that, in an attempt to raise more revenue, Anywhere State University increases its tuition. Will this necessarily result
Akimi4 [234]

Answer:

1. That will not necessarily result in more revenue because it depends on the price elasticity of demand for the schools tuition fees

Explanation:

Suppose that, in an attempt to raise more revenue, Anywhere State University increases its tuition.

1. That will not necessarily result in more revenue because it depends on the price elasticity of demand for the schools tuition fees

2. Under the conditions that price is in-elastic, revenue will rise,

Under the conditions that price is elastic, revenue will fall,

Depending on the mix of reaction, if there is a 50% elasticity and 50% in-elasticity, revenue may remain the same.

3. Explain this process, focusing on the relationship between the increased revenue from students enrolling at ASU despite the higher tuition

<em>This would mean that schooling at ASU has an inelastic demand as earlier stated.</em>

4. Explain the process of  lost revenue from possible lower enrollment.

<em>This would mean that schooling at ASU has an elastic demand as earlier stated.</em>

5. If the true price elasticity were -1.1, what would you suggest the university do to expand revenue?

<em>Above unitary elasticity implies that the demand for the school is very elastic i.e. revenue will fall with increase in tuition fees</em>

<em />

6. If I were the president of ASU, I would tackle this problem <em>based on what I have learned about price elasticity by reducing tuition fees a little to increase revenue much more since the price elasticity is above 1.</em>

<em />

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is true?a. Using accelerated depreciation rather than straight line would normally have no eff
IRISSAK [1]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "A": Using accelerated depreciation rather than straight line would normally have no effect on a project's total projected cash flows but it would affect the timing of the cash flows and thus the NPV.

Explanation:

Accelerated depreciation is a form of accounting and taxation used in the first years of an asset to allow greater deductions. On the other hand, the deductions are distributed evenly throughout the life of the asset using the Straight-line Depreciation method. Accelerated depreciation facilitates higher expenses to be incurred during the first years of an asset while in use, and lower expenses years later, as long as the asset depreciates.

In that sense, when it comes to the total projected cash flow of a company on a project, neither the accelerated depreciation or the straight-line method would affect it but both of them have impact on the timing of the cash flows since accelerated depreciation demands higher expenses since the beginning of the possession of the assets while the straight-line method keeps the expenses steady. Both, also affect the net present value (NPV) of the company since with the accelerated depreciation the cash flow will be less and with the straight-line method it should be constant.

7 0
3 years ago
Keisha is buying John's house. The closing date (day belongs to seller) of the sale transaction is September 1 (day 244 of the y
SSSSS [86.1K]

Answer: $116.026

Explanation:

Given the following ;

Yearly hazard insurance = $350

Keisha is the buyer and the closing date of transaction is September 1 of the year.

January 1 till September 1 = 244days

Now Keisha will have to credit John from September 2 till December 31st of that year

Therefore,

September 2 till December 31 = 365 - 244 = 121 days

Daily hazard insurance = $350 ÷ 365 = $0.9589

Keisha's share = $0.9589 × 121 = $116.026

7 0
3 years ago
olsan Technologies had received a contract to produce two units of a new cruise missile guidance control. The first unit took 5,
Effectus [21]

Answer:

$1,901,385

Explanation:

First unit produced by lambda took 5,000 hours to produce and required $30,000 worth of materials and equipment usage.

The second unit took 4,500 hours and used $24,000 worth of materials and equipment usage.

learning rate = time needed to produce second unit / time needed to produce first unit = 4,500 hours / 5,000 hours = 90%

materials and equipment usage rate = $24,000 / $30,000 = 80%

using the attached table of cumulative values, we can determine the cumulative improvement factors needed to solve this question:

Olsan's accumulated cost for producing 20 more guidance controls

  • work hours = 4,500 x 14.61 (90% and 20 units) x $25 per hour = $1,643,625
  • materials and equipment = $24,000 x 10.74 (95% and 20 units) = $257,760
  • total = $1,901,385

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Shanti recently went to a communication workshop to help improve her workplace performance. She learned that in effective commun
    9·1 answer
  • Required information Kevan, Jerry, and Dave formed Albee LLC. Jerry and Dave each contributed $245,000 in cash. Kevan contribute
    12·1 answer
  • The entry to adjust for the cost of supplies used during the accounting period is______________.
    15·1 answer
  • __________ is a qualitative forecasting technique in which experts work individually to develop forecasts. The individual foreca
    6·1 answer
  • A stock has a beta of 1.28, the expected return on the market is 12 percent, and the risk-free rate is 4.5 percent. What must th
    5·1 answer
  • Using the vendor that all Camp Bow Wow franchises use, which gives a volume discount, purchase additional ramps, tunnels, and po
    10·1 answer
  • What is the difference between the turbo button and the victim button
    8·1 answer
  • term fixed price contract to build an office tower for​ $10,000,000. In the first year of the contract Tullis incurs​ $3,000,000
    11·1 answer
  • Click this link to view O*NET’s Skills section for Film and Video Editors. Note that common skills are listed toward the top, an
    9·2 answers
  • Which speaker is most likely to make high-risk investments?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!