All categories

3 years ago

If the cyclist has 2000 j of potential energy at point c how high is the hill

Physics

1 answer:

fgiga [73]3 years ago

5 0

That's really going to depend on ...

-- where point-c is

and

-- the cyclist's mass

and

-- the acceleration of gravity on the planet where the hill is

You might be interested in

Confirmation bias can affect our problem-solving abilities. <br> A. True <br> B. False

marusya05 [52]

The answer true I’m guessing. It’s a 50/50 chance

5 0

2 years ago

Certain rifles can fire a bullet with a speed of 950 m/s just as it leaves the muzzle (this speed is called the muzzle velocity)

TiliK225 [7]

Answer:

a) By $v^2 = u^2 + 2as$ => a= 70291.70.

(b)By $v = u + at$ => t= 1.58 ms.

(c)By $v^2 = u^2 - 2gh$ => H = 46045.92 m.

Explanation:

a) By $v^2 = u^2 + 2as$

$(950)^2 = 0 + 2 \times a \times 0.75\\a = 601666.67 m/s^2\\a/g = 688858.70/9.8 = 70291.70$

(b)By $v = u + at$

$950 = 0 + 601666.67 \times t\\t = 1.58 x 10^-3 sec = 1.58 ms$

(c)By $v^2 = u^2 - 2gh$

$0 = (950)^2 - 2 \times9.8 \times H\\H = 46045.92 m$

4 0

2 years ago

Need help ASAP shoving brainlest plsssss

seraphim [82]

The answer for this would be B!!

3 0

3 years ago

A river 1.00 mile wide flows with a constant speed of 1.00 mph. A man can row a boat at 2.00 mph. He crosses the river in a dire

gladu [14]

To solve this problem we will apply the geometric concepts of displacement according to the description given. Taking into account that there is an initial displacement towards the North and then towards the west, therefore the speed would be:

$V_T^2=v_N^2-v_W^2$

$V_T = \sqrt{v_N^2-v_W^2}$

Travel north 2mph and west to 1mph, then,

$V_T = \sqrt{2^2-1^2}$

$V_T = \sqrt{3}$

The route is done exactly the same to the south and east, so make this route twice, from the definition of speed we have to

$v= \frac{\Delta x}{t}$

$t = \frac{\Delta x}{v}$

$t = \frac{2*(1mile)}{\sqrt{3}mph}$

$t = 1.15hour$

Therefore the total travel time for the man is 1.15hour.

3 0

3 years ago

"In a pure substance all the particles must be identical; therefore pure substances are composed only of elements." Do you agree

kenny6666 [7]

I do not agree with the statement.
The "substance" can be a compound. It's "pure"
as long as there's nothing else in it but its name.

'Pure' water is 100% H₂O with nothing else in it.
'Pure' table salt is 100% NaCl with nothing else in it.
'Pure' carbon dioxide is 100% CO₂ with nothing else in it.

These example substances are all compounds, not elements.

6 0

2 years ago