The answer should be a) Because the French was lead by Rochambeau and was there at the perfect time. Though c did happen as well, just earlier not during the battle of Yorktown
The Brahmaputra swash is known as Tsangpo in Tibet. Tibet is a veritably cold and dry area; therefore, the swash carries veritably small quantum of water leading to veritably lower ground content, despite having a large course. But once it enters India, Brahmaputra is fed by heavy rains, and it carries lot of water and ground.
The Brahmaputra swash in its Tibetan part have lower slit because it's cold and a dry area. In India it passes through a region of high downfall, then it carries a large volume of water and considerable quantum of tear. But in Tibetan part of its there's lower downfall and that is the reason of lower slit and water. But during the stormy season, every time the swash overflows its banks, that causes wide desolation due to cataracts in Assam and Bangladesh. It collects huge volume of tear on its bed causing the swash bed to rise and the swash also shifts its channel constantly.
What is Brahmaputra?
- the Brahmaputra also known as the Yarlung Tsangpo in Tibet, the Siang/ Dihang River in Arunachal Pradesh, and Luit in Assamese, is a trans- boundary swash which flows through Tibet, India, and Bangladesh. It's the 9th largest swash in the world by discharge, and the 15th longest.
- With its origin in the Manasarovar Lake region, near Mount Kailash, on the northern side of the Himalayas in Burang County of Tibet where it's known as the Yarlung Tsangpo River,( 1) it flows along southern Tibet to break through the Himalayas in great ravines( including the Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon) and into Arunachal Pradesh
- It flows southwest through the Assam Valley as the Brahmaputra and south through Bangladesh as the Jamuna( not to be confused with the Yamuna of India). In the vast Ganges Delta, it merges with the Ganges, popularly known as the Padma in Bangladesh, and becomes the Meghna and eventually empties into the Bay of Bengal.
Learn more about Brahmaputra brainly.com/question/21009194
#SPJ9
Historian Frederick Merk says this concept was born out of "a sense of mission to redeem the Old World by high example ... generated by the potentialities of a new earth for building a new heaven".[4]
Historians have emphasized that "manifest destiny" was a contested concept—pre-civil war Democrats endorsed the idea but many prominent Americans (such as Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and most Whigs) rejected it. Historian Daniel Walker Howe writes, "American imperialism did not represent an American consensus; it provoked bitter dissent within the national polity ... Whigs saw America's moral mission as one of democratic example rather than one of conquest."[5]
Newspaper editor John O'Sullivan is generally credited with coining the term manifest destiny in 1845 to describe the essence of this mindset, which was a rhetorical tone;[6] however, the unsigned editorial titled "Annexation" in which it first appeared was arguably written by journalist and annexation advocate Jane Cazneau.[7] The term was used by Democrats in the 1840s to justify the war with Mexico and it was also used to divide half of Oregon with the United Kingdom. But manifest destiny always limped along because of its internal limitations and the issue of slavery, says Merk. It never became a national priority. By 1843 John Quincy Adams, originally a major supporter of the concept underlying manifest destiny, had changed his mind and repudiated expansionism because it meant the expansion of slavery in Texas.
congestion, pollution crime, and disease