The executive power has grown thanks to the social perception of international crisis. Additionally, this has caused the three branches of public power to weaken.
The central theme of the text is the transformation that the central executive power of the United States has had, influenced by different factors such as:
- Indochina War
- Watergate case
These events have caused the presidency of the United States to acquire more power to make decisions. One of the important aspects of this transformation is international politics because the influence of the international crisis made the executive branch grow in importance.
This deepened an internal crisis between the balance of powers, because the executive branch acquired more power in foreign affairs and this situation is being projected onto the national scene of the United States.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/17905949
Note: This question is missing because the text is missing.
In the last years presidential primacy, so indispensable to the political order, has turned into presidential supremacy. The constitutional Presidency—as events so apparently disparate as the Indochina War and the Watergate affair showed, has become the imperial Presidency and threatens to be the revolutionary Presidency. . . . The imperial Presidency was essentially the creation of foreign policy. A combination of doctrines and emotions—belief in the permanent and universal crisis, fear of communism, faith in the duty and right of the United States to intervene swiftly in every part of the world—had brought about the unprecedented centralization of decisions. Prolonged war in Vietnam strengthened the tendencies toward both centralization and exclusion. So the imperial Presidency grew at the expense of the constitutional order. Like the cowbird, it hatched its own eggs and pushed the others out of the nest. And, as it overwhelmed the traditional separation of powers in foreign affairs, it began to aspire toward an equivalent centralization of power in the domestic polity.
Learn more in:
<u>Answer:</u>
B) Union troops wanted to strike fear into Confederates by devastating their towns.
C) Union troops sought to destroy resources that Confederate troops needed to fight.
These statements reveal about Union tactics during the Civil War.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Union state tactics to win the civil war was simple, which was aimed to break the resource supply so that the confederate army would become vulnerable and shatter the towns on their way to create fear among the people.
<u>The northern army had 5 major goals-
</u>
1. To block their help from abroad by taking control over the southern coasts.
2. Taking control over the Mississippi river so that it would separate Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas from other Confederate states.
3. To capture Richmond.
4. To shatter the morale of civilians
5. To use the troop size and break the spirit of the confederate army.
It pretty much was told that his people were not to get mixed up with the other people, and what they were originating with. Or pretty much, their affairs, if you put it that way. Some heard the term ... 'bad association spoils useful habits'. This is what Washington was worried about. And both John And Tom had to align this case in court I believe. They would have to let the Judge know the situation and everything.
And they key address would be the following:
Washington Court house.
And the key from this was to support their side of the 'family'.
2x2 = 4
5x5-4+6 = 27
Thank you for the free points
Question: <em>Why can social media often be described as an echo chamber?</em>
I think that your answer is,
When people are on their cell devices and using the internet, they tend to block out things around them such as, someone telling them that on Tuesday someone will be calling them or, they have an important event coming up, and the person being told that is or was on their cell device at the time forgets what they were told. An echo chamber is when <em>someone isn't paying attention to the real world and is caught up in social media.</em>
