Answer:
<h3>He should have found 8 as the exponent, not –8.</h3>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the expression simplified by Pablo as data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/400d4/400d440d7fb1d876adc177414baefccdb7cd5e29" alt="(2^{-4})^{-2}"
On simplification we have;
According to one of the law of indices data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe665/fe66514feb70949f694d2fc7ae23ed80af97e9c5" alt="(a^{m})^{n} = a^{mn}"
Applying this law to the question will give;
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/660d5/660d52b52a29c305fda80923c3f97a2fd589b3e8" alt="(2^{-4})^{-2}\\=2^{-4*-2} \\\= 2^{8}"
Based on the calculation above, the exponent of 2 is 8 which means that Pablo should have found 8 as the exponent, not –8.
12/36 = 1/3
.........................................................................
Answer: For number one it's decreasing
Step-by-step explanation: