Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Insurance companies will only cover losses suffered while the policy is already in place.
Explanation:
Regardless of the type of insurance you purchase, the purpose of the coverage is having a policy in case an unexpected unfortunate event takes place. <em>Insurances do not enroll individuals who need the policy just because of an ongoing accident</em>. Those individuals could enroll in an insurance plan but the ongoing accident will not be covered by the company. Only those events happening when the policy is already valid are subject to evaluation for coverage.
Answer:
The offeror may retract the offer at any time prior to acceptance.
Most likely the offeror was able to get a better deal somewhere else, which allows the offeror to retract the offer. However, if they had already made a deal, the offeror would have broken the deal, which may result in action.
~
Answer: D. The neighbor, because obtaining financing was a condition precedent.
Explanation:
Even though it wasn't listed in the written contract, there was the condition precedent that the contract would not be binding unless funding was obtained. Condition precedent is a condition that must happen for a contract to become enforceable.
Funding was not obtained so the contract cannot be enforced. The neighbor would therefore prevail so long as the owner admits that there was indeed a condition precedent.
Answer:
A) No, it is preferable to compare the fund against the Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, Far East (EAFE) Index because it covers international securities.
Explanation:
As It is important that a specific mutual fund should be compared against the benchmark i.e. considered appropriate. The performance of the international fund should also be compared against the foreign stock index like EAFE index
So in this way the agent should be responded to the current situation
Therefore the option a is correct
Answer:
Capitation
Fee for service
Explanation:
Bundled payment provide a single payment to hospitals, doctor, physician, and other providers (for home care, lab, medical equipment, etc.) for a defined episode of care. It is described as "a middle channel" between fee-for-service reimbursement (that allows providers to be paid for each service they render to a patient) and Capitation (that allows for providers to be paid a "lump sum" per patient not regarding how many services the patient receives), given the risk is shared between payer and provider. Bundled payments was proposed in the health care reform debate of the United States as a strategy for reducing health care costs, especially during the Obama administration.
