1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vesna_86 [32]
3 years ago
11

Nobles had overthrown most of the monarchs by

History
1 answer:
Degger [83]3 years ago
6 0
You have to specify in what country? If the answer is France, they were mad at Louis XIV because he gave them no taxation yet no representation in government. This was very common in an absolutist government like France at the time. The nobles wanted the say in government so they teamed up with the peasants (had taxation and no representation) who were also very mad and they went to war with the monarchy. The monarchy lost because of the amount of people the nobles and peasants had. 
You might be interested in
Which was an African slave who participated in the Spanish exploration of North America?
jarptica [38.1K]
North American Slavery in the Spanish and English Colonies. Both Spain and England participated in the slave trade of Native Americans and Africans to supplement their colonial labor forces. However, the Spanish government did not allow Florida Indians to be slaves as was the law and practice in other Spanish colonies.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The farmers sought to limit the federal government by dividing power among the branches of government as well as
Zigmanuir [339]
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "D: between the federal government and the states." The farmers sought to limit the federal government by dividing power among the branches of government as well as between the federal government and the states<span>
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Who were the major aggressor nations of the 1930's and how did they build their empires?
Tanzania [10]

Answer:

Germany, Italy, and Japan

Explanation:

They were the aggressor nations during the 1930's until 1943 for Italy (Italy surrendered in 1943), and 1945 for Germany/Japan (Germany surrendered in May/Japan in August/Sept). Hitler took leadership of Germany in 1933: Due to the "Armistice Agreement" that ended WWI, Germany was forbidden to build a strong Army, Navy or Air Force. He found a "loophole" around the treaty by building an army which trained on wooden rifles & machinguns, and cardboard tanks. His navy was built around submarines, a vessel not considered as important as Battleships. His Air Force was created by civilian "Flying Clubs", using GLIDERS to train his future pilots. By the end of the 1930's, Germany violated the treaty restrictions in THE OPEN, as there was no "teeth" in the enforcement of the treaty. Mussolini took leadership of Italy in 1922, and simply developed his armed forces from the position that they occupied when he took over. Mussolini attempted to "re-create a new Rome." Hirohito inherited the throne, becoming Emperor in 1926. In 1926, Japan was already a powerful war machine. Having defeated China in 1894, Russia in 1905, and was an allied power against Germany during WWI (1914-1918).

6 0
3 years ago
Why did industrials want japan to expand
geniusboy [140]

<span>
Japan emerged in 1853 from two and a half centuries of self-imposed peaceful isolation, but within a few decades the country’s leaders embarked on a policy of aggressive territorial expansion.  During the last half of the nineteenth century, the Western imperialist powers of England, France, and Germany established the model for acquisition of colonies in Asia and for the partition of China into spheres of influence.  Near the end of the century, about the same time Japan began to capture colonial territory, the United States and Russia also initiated their imperialistic expansion in Asia.This paper will examine four of the most influential theories of imperialism to determine whether they can provide explanations for Japan’s imperialism from 1894 to 1910, when Japan formally annexed Korea.  The four theories to be reviewed will be Hobson's theory of domestic market underconsumption that leads to capitalists seeking profits overseas, Lenin's theory of the monopoly stage of capitalism, Schumpeter's theory of inherited warlike tendencies from prior generations, and nationalism's focus on politics as the critical factor.  Although other theories of imperialism exist, these four theories cover a broad range of economic, political, and sociological factors that could explain Japan’s imperialistic expansion.  This essay's review of Japan's history of imperialism from 1894 to 1910 will show that the theory of nationalism provides the best explanations of the causes of Japan's militaristic actions and colonial acquisitions, although Schumpeter's sociological-based theory seems to provide some explanation for the actions of the Meiji Period (1868-1912) leaders.</span>
8 0
4 years ago
What does the resolution after the XYZ Affairs say about the new US and its approach to the greater world?
Simora [160]

The resolution of the  XYZ affair shows the United States wanted to establish diplomatic relationships with other countries and avoid non-ethical negotiations.

The XYZ affair was a diplomatic conflict between the United States and France, this conflict occurred by the end of the 18th century and led to a naval war.

This diplomatic conflict was considered controversial because members of the French government tried to bribe the American diplomats to begin the negotiations. This event was opposed by the American government, and the conflict between both countries increased.

All this situation led the United States to two main actions:

  • The creation of the Alien and Sedition act that restricted immigrants, especially those from "hostile nations".
  • The creation of protocols for official communications and negotiations between countries.

These two actions show the willingness of the United States to create diplomatic relationships with other countries but avoid a similar situation that involved bribes or non-ethical communication.

Learn more in: brainly.com/question/19563529

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the difference between the ironclads, the Monitor, and the Merrimac?
    9·1 answer
  • How many amendments does the Constitution currently<br> have?
    15·1 answer
  • 1. What did James Madison believe people “owned” as a natural right, and why
    12·1 answer
  • ANSWER QUICK PLS K12 HISTORY
    6·1 answer
  • Did the egyptians invent geometry
    7·1 answer
  • Little rock nine incident occorred in the state of
    10·1 answer
  • The knights of Europe could be compared to the Japanese ___________.
    7·2 answers
  • How is mexico's climate different from uruguay's climate?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes European culture?
    6·2 answers
  • PLEASE HURRY ! Read the preamble to the Constitution.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!