1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AVprozaik [17]
3 years ago
14

which of Stalin's pathos appeals are designed to produce positive emotions in the audience, and which are designed ti evoke nega

tive emotions? explain how both types of pathos appeals work together to make Stalin's speech persuasive. 60 pts.
History
1 answer:
Yuri [45]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

When Stalin speaks about Russia, or it’s armed forces, he is trying to produce positive emotion by promoting pride and nationalism. When he talks about Germany or Fascism, on the other hand, he is trying to produce fear and hatred. These two pathos appeals work together by creating a division between the states of Russia and Germany. The division is also between Russia and everyone else. This us and them mentality nurtures a strong bond between the Russian people and distrust towards “others.”

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Who were the first people to really promote worshipping only one god?
loris [4]
Christopher Columbus was the first
6 0
3 years ago
What was an effect of agreements made by the Allies at the Potsdam
Gnesinka [82]

Answer: C

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
What was true about the 13 amendment
shutvik [7]

Answer:

The 13th amendment, which formally abolished slavery in the United States, passed the Senate on April 8, 1864, and the House on January 31, 1865. On February 1, 1865, President Abraham Lincoln approved the Joint Resolution of Congress submitting the proposed amendment to the state legislatures. The necessary number of states ratified it by December 6, 1865. The 13th amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."

In 1863 President Lincoln had issued the Emancipation Proclamation declaring “all persons held as slaves within any State, or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free.” Nonetheless, the Emancipation Proclamation did not end slavery in the nation. Lincoln recognized that the Emancipation Proclamation would have to be followed by a constitutional amendment in order to guarantee the abolishment of slavery.

The 13th amendment was passed at the end of the Civil War before the Southern states had been restored to the Union and should have easily passed the Congress. Although the Senate passed it in April 1864, the House did not. At that point, Lincoln took an active role to ensure passage through congress. He insisted that passage of the 13th amendment be added to the Republican Party platform for the upcoming Presidential elections. His efforts met with success when the House passed the bill in January 1865 with a vote of 119–56.

With the adoption of the 13th amendment, the United States found a final constitutional solution to the issue of slavery. The 13th amendment, along with the 14th and 15th, is one of the trio of Civil War amendments that greatly expanded the civil rights of Americans.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
summarize the political gains blacks hoped to gain after the passage of the 13th amendment and how did white southeners respond
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

The amendment prohibiting slavery was ratified by the US Congress in 1865, after it was adopted by the necessary three quarters of the states (27 of the 36 existing then). The Thirteenth Amendment prohibited slavery and forced labor, except for punishing a crime. In particular, section IV of article IV was also amended, which had previously forbidden to facilitate the escape of slaves. However, some southern states at first refused to accept the amendment and did so only after some time.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A rising sense of nationalism in china was a reaction to
irakobra [83]

Answer:

the foreign exploitation of their territory and resources

Explanation:

The Chinese people were struggling for several centuries, especially after they fell under the rule of the Manchu. The Manchu rulers were of different ethnic group, and they didn't had in their best interest the Chinese identity and unity, but the opposite. These rulers also allowed the European colonial powers to bribe them, and with it to be granted the best Chinese ports and the area surrounding them. This led to economic downfall of China, as the profit from the trade through their ports was going in the European pockets, and their natural resources were used, but the Chinese people were not getting anything from it. This led to revolt, and gradually to revival of the nationalism in China. The people started to unite for their common interest, and to work together for their best interest.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Need helpp right now for my module:<
    10·1 answer
  • I'm so confused and really need help please! Are these correct?​
    9·1 answer
  • How did the geography of Africa affect the value of trade goods?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the end of the cold war shift the international balance of power
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a benefit of free trade?
    8·1 answer
  • I need help asap:( ... (it's for an exam )
    9·2 answers
  • What was life like for people in medieval japan who
    8·2 answers
  • Which European country was the first to establish permanent settlements in
    5·1 answer
  • Do you think that the U.S. considers their own
    13·1 answer
  • This is a quote from a speech that greatly influenced United States foreign policy.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!