All categories

3 years ago

The three vertices of a triangle drawn on a complex plane are represented by 0 + 0i, 4 + 0i, and 0+ 3i.

1 answer:

4 0

Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. Below is the solution for the above problem. I hope the answer will help you.

<span>a² + b² = c²
3² + 4² = c²
25 = c²
c = 5</span>

You might be interested in

Is 3/10 equivalent to 2/5 please tell me the right answer

aev [14]

3 divided by 10 is 0.3

2 divided by 5 is 0.4.

They are not equivalent.

8 0

3 years ago

As – 16a,<br> as – 4a3,<br> 2a3 + 8a - 4a2 - 16

vfiekz [6]

Answer:

1) as-16a

taknig a as common

=a(s-16)

2)as-4a³

taking a as common

=a(s-4a²)

3)2a³+8a-4a²-16

taking common terms

=2a(a²+4)-4(a²+4)

=(2a-4)(a²+4)

again taking common

=2(a-2)(a²+4)

i hope this will help you :)

7 0

3 years ago

The amount of money in a bank account increased by 15.8% over the last year. If the amount of money at the beginning of the year

Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

The expression represents the amount of money in the bank account after the increase is: x=1.158n.

Step-by-step explanation:

With the information provided, you can say that the amount of money in the bank after the increase would be equal to multiplying the amount at the beginning of the year for the result of adding up 1 plus the percentage of the increase, which would be:

x=n*(1+0.158)

x=n*1.158

x=1.158n, where:

x is the amount of money in the bank account after the increase

n is the amount of money at the beginning of the year

5 0

3 years ago

What is an equation for the line that passes through the points (-2, 3) and (2, 1)?

wolverine [178]

Answer:

y=-4+-1

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this is what your looking for

8 0

3 years ago

Formalize the following argument by using the given predicates and then rewriting the argument as a numbered sequence of stateme

sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

The answer is " $\bold{((P_2 \wedge P_3)\longrightarrow P_1 \longrightarrow P_1 }$ ".

Step-by-step explanation:

Let assuming the following predicates:

$\to B(x,y)= \text{x barks at y} \\\\\to D (x)= \text{x is a dog} \\\\\to C (x)= \text{x is a cat} \\\\$

In the given table it calculates the numbered sequence, which is given in the statement and calculates the other details, please find the attached file.

Premise P1 means whether dogs are shouting at cats.

Premise P2 means Maximum is a dog.

Premise P3 means that a cat is Moonbeam.

Unless the assumptions P1, P2, and P3 all are valid, otherwise the conclusion that Maximum starts barking at Moonbeam also is correct.

By both the law of deduction of Modus Ponens, statement 4 is the interpretation of states 1, 2, and 3. That conclusion can thus be conveyed as follows:

so, the final answer is " $\bold{((P_2 \wedge P_3)\longrightarrow P_1 \longrightarrow P_1 }$ "

5 0

3 years ago