Because it offers the historian an objective snapshot of the public sentiment of the time, which the cartoonist (should be) distilling for their readers, according to their feelings, for mass appeal. I say objective as it is usually very easy to decipher their subjective viewpoint according to the publication. The value of this is that it is tapping into how the masses 'feel' rather than how subjective facts can be built to form historical opinion. It becomes especially valuable prior to this century, when public sentiment is harder to garner as we were less technologically advanced.
Im pretty sure it’s because of the of when it turns into red and does its dance but eats it li
The statement that describes the distinction between British and French rule in Africa is D. France used direct rule, while Britain used indirect rule.
It should be noted that the main difference between the way the French and the British ruled African countries was that while the French used direct rule, the British used indirect rule.
The indirect rule implies a form of government whereby the governed people have certain legal, administrative, and other powers. While the British still have certain powers over the people they ruled, the French were direct in their approach.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25555071
C. Right to life, liberty,and pursuit of happiness
