Incomplete question. I answered from a general economic standpoint.
Answer:
<u>stay the same; decrease</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember</em>, in this scenario, it wasn't as though the mentioned workers lost their jobs, they only had their hours reduced by their employers; so they are not <u>unemployed</u>. This, therefore, implies that the unemployment rate will stay the same.
The labor force participation rate in simple words refers to the percentage of those who are currently employed or looking for a job within an economy. If the working hours are reduced, it may diminish the zeal among the workforce of an economy to work or find work because <u>they may perceive they''ll earn less.</u>
Answer:
that the statutes do not violate the state constitution or the us constitution.
Explanation:
State courts can remove laws from the bench. Think about what the supreme court does on a daily basis which is to review laws and determine if they are allowable under the constitution, think roe v wade, brown v board of education. state courts do this too. Think the recent texas abortion law. State courts have the responsibility to solve cases in a constitutional manner.
Pulsing advertising does exactly that, continuous advertising year round and then a bump in advertising when sells peak. Pulsing<span> combines </span>flighting<span> and continuous </span><span>scheduling.</span>
