1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
barxatty [35]
3 years ago
13

What is the simplified form of the expression? 1/3(21m + 27)

Mathematics
1 answer:
Zanzabum3 years ago
3 0
1/3(21m + 27)

distribute 1/3

7m + 9

B
You might be interested in
Please help me simplify
PilotLPTM [1.2K]
The answer is A. 4.08
7 0
2 years ago
Tina recorded data to represent the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. She determined the
Anit [1.1K]

Answer:5

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
5+5+10+10+20+15-13+17
Pavel [41]
95 is the right answer
7 0
3 years ago
Can someone please help?
kifflom [539]
Standard form means, move the variables to the left-hand-side and leave the constant all by herself on the right-hand-side, usually sorting the variables, so"x" goes first.

now, there's a denominator, we can do away with it, by simply multiplying both sides by the denominator, so let's do so,

\bf y=-\cfrac{2}{3}x+7\implies \boxed{3}\cdot y=\boxed{3}\cdot \left( -\cfrac{2}{3}x+7 \right)\implies 3y=-2x+21
\\\\\\
\stackrel{standard~form}{2x+3y=21}
5 0
3 years ago
Write an indirect proof showing that the diagonals of a parallelogram intersect each other
____ [38]
Its an indirect proof, so 3 steps :-
1) you start with the opposite of wat u need to prove 
2) arrive at a contradiction
3) concludeReport · 29/6/2015261
since you wanto prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', you start wid the opposite of above statement, like below :- step1 : Since we want to prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', lets start by assuming the opposite, that the diagonals of parallelogram dont bisect each other.Report · 29/6/2015261


Since, we assumed that the diagonals dont bisect each other, 
OC≠OA 
OD≠OBReport · 29/6/2015261
Since, OC≠OA, △OAD is not congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261

∠AOD≅∠BOC as they are vertical angles, 
∠OAD≅∠OCB they are alternate interior angles 
AD≅BC, by definition of parallelogram 
so, by AAS, △OAD is congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
But, thats a contradiction as we have previously established that those triangles are congruentReport · 29/6/2015261
step3 :
since we arrived at a contradiction, our assumption is wrong. so, the opposite of our assumption must be correct. so diagonals of parallelogram bisect each other.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Help me solve <br> 6x+5-3x=26
    6·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • Which set of line segments could create a right triangle?
    8·1 answer
  • The following dot plots shows the number of strokes golf players required at each hole .Each dot represents a different player.O
    12·2 answers
  • What is the explicit rule for this geometric sequence? 2, 6, 18, 54, …
    9·1 answer
  • In a group of 36 children, there are twice as many boys as girls, how many girls are there?
    15·1 answer
  • NEED QUICK HELP.
    8·1 answer
  • To calculate the height of a tree, Sophie measures the angle of elevation from a point “A” to be 34°. She then walks 10 m direct
    8·2 answers
  • Y+9 – x; use x = 1, and y = 3
    14·1 answer
  • How does the graph of g(x) = (x - 3)^3 - 2 differ from the group of f(x) = x^3?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!