Explanation:
<em><u>1</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>advertising</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
<em><u>2</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>distribution</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
<em><u>3</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>well</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>crafted</u></em>
Answer:
C. Capital Loss
Explanation:
When the selling price of an asset like bonds etc exceeds it purchase price then the capital profit will be the difference between sale and purchase price.
But if the purchase price is greater than the sale price the difference is called Capital loss.
Example: if we buy 100 shares for $20 each and after a year sell them for $ 18 then the difference is called the capital loss.
Answer:
The correct answer is option B.
Explanation:
In 2017, Lynx earned an accounting profit of $3 million.
Lynx's production facilities might have also been used to produce components for mobile phones, which would have generated $2 million in revenues and saved the company $500,000 in production costs.
The accounting profit involves only explicit costs. While economic profit includes both explicit as well as implicit cost.
Here, the implicit cost is the opportunity cost of producing toys components. Lynx could have earned greater profit if it produced components for mobile phone and also could have saved cost of production.
Economic profit
= accounting profit - implicit cost
= $3 million - ($2 million + $500,000)
= $3 million - $2.5 million
= $500,000
So, Lynx had an economic profit of $500,000.
Answer:
Antonio
Explanation:
In simple words, Antonio has a lot of support among economists. Price discrimination occurs when a vendor is able to split clients into groupings or segregate a marketplace into two categories so that they may charge varying charges to that same two groups. It has hardly anything to deal with the customers' age.
Thus, Antonio is correct with his views.
Answer:
No, contracts for personal services are not assignable.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
Yes, as long as the assignment does not increases the burden on Max.
Yes, Claire can assign her obligations under the contract to anyone who accepts.
No, contracts for personal services are not assignable.
No, the assignment is not valid since Max did not give any consideration.
This is most likely not a good strategy for this woman. The fact that this woman has been hired as a freelance web designer means thta the woman is beig paid for her professional expertise. No one else can perform the job in the way that she can perform it. Therefore, she cannot assign this duty to another person.