Firstly, humans did not evolve from monkeys. Instead, monkeys and humans share a common ancestor from which both evolved around 25 million years ago. This evolutionary relationship is supported both by the fossil record and DNA analysis. A 2007 study showed that humans and rhesus monkeys share about 93% of their DNA.
The regression equation is:
y = 1.15 – 0.251 x₁ + 0.078 x₂ + 0.306 x₁x₂
<span>
<span>
<span>
Where,
x₁ = -0.2508
x₂ = 0.0777
x₁x₂ = 0.3058
Inserting the values,
<span>
<span>
</span></span>y = 1.15 – {0.251 × (-0.2508)} + {0.078 ×(0.0777)} + {0.306 × (0.3058)}
</span></span></span>
y = 1.15 - (- 0.0629508) + 0.0060606 + 0.935748
y = 1.15 + 0.0629508 + 0.0060606 + 0.935748
y = 1.3125862
Answer:
x₁ and x₂ are main effects (a type of tuna and type of packing liquid) that contribute significant information for the prediction of <span>y.</span>
The acetabulum is a fossa formed by the ilium, ischium and pubis which with the femoral head forms the coxal joint.
The acetabulum is made up of the three bones that make up the coxal bone (hip bone).
The ischium, which offers the lower and side limits to the acetabulum, makes up somewhat more than two-fifths of the structure.
Less than two-fifths of the acetabulum's structure is provided by the ilium, which also serves as the top limit of the joint.
The pubis, which is close to the midline, forms the remainder.
The acetabulofemoral joint (art. coxae), also known as the coxal joint, is the joint between the head of the femur and the acetabulum of the pelvis.
Its main job is to support the weight of the body in both static (such as while standing) and dynamic (such as when walking or running) postures.
Learn more about Hip joint here brainly.com/question/12522711
#SPJ4
They will run out. Because nonrenewable means it can't be renewed until like millions of year or so. Hope this helps and You're Welcome! :3
Answer:
A common misconception is that scientific theories are rudimentary ideas that will eventually graduate into scientific laws when enough data and evidence have been accumulated. A theory does not change into a scientific law with the accumulation of new or better evidence.
Explanation:
