Question

Suppose two economists are arguing about policies that deal with unemployment. One economist says, " the government could lower unemployment by one percentage point if it would just increase government spending by 50 billion dollars". The other economist responds, " Hogwash. If the government spent an additional 50 billion dollars, it would reduce unemployment by only one tenth of one percent, and that effect would only be temporary". These economists:

Answer 1

Answer:

The correct answer is Disagree because they have different scientific judgements.

Explanation:

Obviously, what is demonstrated in the previous situation is that the two economists think differently. For this reason, they have different judgments from a training that allows them to recognize the events and propose alternatives to the problems presented.

Value judgments are the criticisms or comments that all people make towards other people or things depending on our perspectives or tastes.

Scientific judgments are always objective and are made with the scientific method, and are made with observation and verification.

We make moral judgments based on the "good or bad" human acts of a person and thus to discover their morality.