Answer: <em>Cost of Goods Manufactured = $ 660,000</em>
Explanation:
Direct Material Used $ 240,000
Direct labor $ 250,000
Manufacturing overheads applied $ 150,000
Total manufacturing Cost $ 640,000
Add: Work in process $ 40,000
Total Manufacturing cost $ 680,000
Less: Work in process $ 20,000
Cost of Goods Manufactured $ 660,000
<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
Answer:
August = $5, 472
September = $5,419
Explanation:
Shadee Corporation
Cash Receipt Budget
For the month of August & September
August September
Sales Volume 460 470
Price per unit 12 12
Total Sales $5,520 $5,640
60% Cash Sales $3,312 $3,384
Credit Sales:
54% collected in the month of sales
$1,192 $1,218
37% collected in the following month
$968 (1) $817
Total budgeted cash receipt
$5,472 $5,419
Note: (1)
37% of July's credit sale will be collected in the month of August. Therefore,
July's total sales = 545 × 12 = $6540
60% of them is cash = $3,924
Remaining is credit = $2,616
37% of credit sales = $2,616 × 37% = $968
Answer:
the holding period return is 3.77%
Explanation:
The computation of the holding period return is shown below:
Holding period return is
= (Income + (Selling price - Purchase price)) ÷ Purchase price
= ($3 + ($52 - $53)) ÷ 53
= 3.77%
Hence, the holding period return is 3.77%
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
